AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Anne Lawson

N173 · N176 · N161 · 31 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
4.35%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Avoid if you have any other option; you will largely teach yourself and fight disorganization.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnresponsiveDisorganized CanvasClinical IntimidationOpen-Book TestsAvoid If Possible
  • and unclear instructions
  • N161 often feels self-taught with useless PowerPoints and
  • Clinical N176 reviews warn of yelling and attempts to push students out of nursing

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

72/100

Many still earn As because and content is passable, despite poor teaching.

Both formats include Easy A comments; late discussion penalties can still fail students.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Material is not conceptually deep, but disorganization and .

; clinical courses feel much harder interpersonally.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

to mandatory clinicals.

Online N161 is often flexible; clinical N176 attendance is effectively mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Take-again rate near 4% with consistent warnings not to enroll.

Negativity is strong in both online lecture and in-person clinical reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

, and nitpicky discussion rules even when quiz scores are solid.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Weekly discussions, quizzes, and reading are steady but not always overwhelming in volume.

Format shift

Online discussions with 24-hour reply rules feel heavier.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Students report no teaching, ignored emails, trash slides, and hostile clinical behavior.

Format shift

Online isolation and .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of discussion boards, quizzes, midterms, and finals, often from textbook banks.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person and clinical sections are widely panned for , and alleged bullying in clinicals.

Main concern

Clinical instructorship is described as hostile and program-threatening.

What students said

“one minute you think youre fine with her, the next minute shes bullying you out of the program”
N176
“Easy A but she sucks”
N161
“She yells at students in clinicals and is not inspiring at all”
N176

Remote format

Online

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online N161 is self-paced chaos: , and quizzes that ignore the slides.

Main concern

Zero instructor support and due dates.

What students said

“never answers emails and she takes forever to grade so it is very hard to know where we stand”
N161
“YOU ARE DEF ON YOUR OWN. Learned nothing except that she does not care about us learning the material”
N161
“Everything is open book which makes it easier. ”
N161

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Several reviews say quizzes and despite poor teaching.

Open book quizzesTextbook bank testsCumulative midterm and final

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person N161 still relies on quizzes and exams tied to the book; clinicals emphasize .

Book-based quizzesPowerPoints unhelpfulClinical evaluation stress
“All the and ”
N161
“the is open book”
N161

Online

Multiple online reviews explicitly call quizzes and and .

Open bookWeekly quizzesCumulative exams
“Even though the , but you cannot find the answers anywhere”
N161
“Everything is open book which makes it easier. ”
N161

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ”

Voice snapshots generated from 31 reviews, highlighting support failures, clinical risk, and . Credibility rating: High.

📵 Zero Support

12/100

“Never replied to emails. ”

🧪 Clinical Warning

10/100

“she is trying to get you kicked out of the nursing program”

📗

72/100

“Easy A but she sucks”

Theme 1

📧 About Communication

  • Awful communication
  • she never answers emails
  • Closed off and curt in correspondence

Theme 2

📚 About Learning Value

  • I didn't feel like I learned a lot in this class, because she didn't post any lectures
  • This class is a big waste of time, I didn't learn a thing
  • lecture powerpoints/her notes are trash

Theme 3

🏥 About Clinicals

  • She yells at students in clinicals
  • bullying you out of the program
  • DON'T DO IT!! Do whatever you

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

31

Recent reviews read by the AI

31

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

31 reviews over many years are highly consistent on unresponsiveness and low teaching quality.

Inside 31 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 55
1 out of 520

Course coverage

N16125 reviews
N1764 reviews
N1732 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

22 reported outcomes

A range

11

A 10 · A- 1

B range

7

B+ 4 · B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 2