AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Jane O'Buchon

MEDSGN172 · NRSGN173 · NURSIN172 · LVNNRSG · N173N176 · N173 · N172 · N172N173 · N161 · NURS21 · NSGPEDS · LABN172 · N101 · N245 · 42 lifetime ratings

AI rating
69/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

Request her if you want rigorous clinical coaching and ; avoid if you need a soft clinical instructor.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerClinical Critical ThinkingApproachable When EngagedHarsh for SomeClear ExpectationsStrong Nursing Coach
  • Many nursing students call her one of the .
  • A vocal minority describe her as demeaning, angry, or anxiety-inducing in clinical.
  • Attendance and active engagement matter; passive students struggle more with her style.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Clinical and lecture success require preparation, critical thinking, and active participation rather than .

All evidence is in person; .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

36/100

Students repeatedly say nursing clinicals and related lecture demand real preparation and thinking like a nurse.

All evidence is in person across clinical and lecture nursing courses.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Clinical and nursing courses treat presence as required, and multiple reviews warn against skipping.

All evidence is in person with .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

Most students strongly recommend her for learning gains despite a significant .

All evidence is in person; recommendation splits around clinical personality more than content.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

56/100

Supporters call her fair with ; critics mainly attack tone more than impossible grade scales.

Format shift

All evidence is in person clinical and .

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Work centers on clinical readiness, care plans, and .

Format shift

All evidence is in person; clinical engagement is the main time demand.

Teaching experience

Good

71/100

Many call her an outstanding nursing coach with , while others report harsh or demeaning clinical interactions.

Format shift

All evidence is in person; experiences diverge sharply by student fit.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

Assessment mixes clinical performance, care plans, lectures, and a limited number of tests depending on the course.

Format shift

All evidence is in person; clinical judgment is central.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

42 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and clinical nursing work, where she is often praised as knowledgeable and motivating but sometimes criticized as harsh or intimidating.

Main concern

Inconsistent interpersonal tone that and demeaning to others.

What students said

“ !”
N173
“Amazing professor. She makes you think critically think like a nurse during clinicals without being intimidating or threatening.”
N172
“She doesn't let you perform a skill without yelling at you.”
MEDSGN172

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize clinical evaluation and standard nursing .

Clinical SkillsCare PlansLecture ExamsStudy GuidesFew Explicit Proctoring Details

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments focus on clinical skill checks, care plans, and conventional lecture exams rather than clearly student-friendly open-book testing.

Clinical SkillsCare PlansLecture Exams
“There are 2 tests and an essay.”
N161
“Grades careplans fairly.cares more about the content of the careplan than its appearance.”
LABN172

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I learned more from her than from all of my other nursing instructors combined.”

Voice snapshots generated from 42 in-person nursing reviews, highlighting clinical coaching strengths and personality polarization. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

71/100

“She is so knowledgeable and caring. and wants to work on developing your critical thinking skills.”

👍 Recommendation Split

72/100

“If you have the ! You will learn so much from her.”

⚠️ Clinical Tone Risk

30/100

“She doesn't let you perform a skill without yelling at you.”

🧠 Learning Payoff

78/100

“She makes you think critically think like a nurse during clinicals without being intimidating or threatening.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Clinical Teaching

  • Amazing professor. She makes you think critically think like a nurse
  • .
  • She is not threatening and approachable.

Theme 2

⚠️

  • She gets angry when you ask questions
  • .

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • She is super sweet and will help you if you need it!
  • .
  • Janine is an excellent professor, very helpful and she brings the and support.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

42

Recent reviews read by the AI

42

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

split between strong admirers and students who found her clinical style harsh.

Inside 42 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 526
4 out of 53
3 out of 53
2 out of 57
1 out of 53

Course coverage

N17215 reviews
N1619 reviews
N1733 reviews
LABN1722 reviews
MEDSGN1722 reviews
Show 10 more courses
N172N1732 reviews
1721 review
LVNNRSG1 review
N1011 review
N173N1761 review
N2451 review
NRSGN1731 review
NSGPEDS1 review
NURS211 review
NURSIN1721 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 2 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values