AI Rate Professor

English

Sarah Dassero

ENG1A · ENG1 · 1A · ENG200 · ENGLISH200 · ENG300 · ENG1B · 30 lifetime ratings

AI rating
76/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
73.33%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Take her if you can handle multi-essay English work and , but expect strict late and AI .

Best fit · Effort For RewardExtra credit heavyEssay-focused EnglishPolarizing graderClear expectationsSlow feedback
  • Many students love her warmth, structure, and abundant , especially in person.
  • A , and unusable delayed feedback.
  • Online sections draw and source-approval timing.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

64/100

and , but essay standards and no-late rules still require consistent work.

Online reviews stress delayed feedback more; with effort and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Content is standard college composition with several essays and but paper-heavy.

; online adds more frustration around process timing.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

while others do not; participation still matters in many courses.

In-person comments and discussion; online comments more often treat attendance as flexible.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

and , but a sizable minority strongly advise avoiding her.

; online reviews are more mixed to negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

and , yet others report tough essay scoring and zero-credit penalties.

Format shift

Online students ; in-person students more often call it fair with support.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Typical and short assignments; manageable if if you fall behind.

Format shift

Both formats center on essays; some online and advanced sections feel more repetitive or paper-heavy.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Strong lectures, humor, and student support dominate positive reviews, tempered by repeated complaints about communication and .

Format shift

; online experience is more process-focused and critical.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Grades , and short writing tasks rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

True across online and in-person sections.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

25 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students more often describe her as caring, funny, organized, and highly recommended, with .

Main concern

A minority call her cold or ruthless on citations and zeroed work, so if expectations are missed.

What students said

“Easily one of the !”
ENG1
“Professor Dassero is one of the !”
ENG1B
“She's expecting you to know how to write, not trying to help you succeed in class.”
ENG1A

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections can feel passable with , but and source-approval timing that arrives too late to help.

Main concern

and late source approvals make essay cycles frustrating and .

What students said

“ so any feedback she gives is useless since it can't be implemented on your next one.”
ENG1B
“This class offers tons of to the a B.”
ENG1A
“she did not submit any grades for the .”
ENG1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and limited mention of high-stakes proctored exams.

Essay-based assessmentExtra credit opportunitiesFew or no traditional examsDiscussion boardsStrict late policy

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person , and occasional quizzes or presentations rather than strict testing software.

Four to five essaysReadings and discussionExtra creditOccasional quizzes or presentations
“A lot of essays and readings and work and effort was put in.”
ENG1
“For this class, you need 5 essays, 13 short reading answers, and for the .”
1A

Online

Online students describe essay packages, weekly discussions, and .

Online essaysDiscussion boardsDelayed essay feedbackSource approval process
“There are 4 .”
ENG1A
“You submit an annotated bibliography before each essay where she will approve the sources.”
ENG1B

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She offers so much easy in her class that it is impossible to not get a good grade.”

Voice snapshots generated from 30 reviews (5 online, 25 in person), highlighting praise, polarity, and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“Easily one of the !”

👍 Recommendation Split

72/100

“I highly reccomend her!”

⚠️

35/100

“ so any feedback she gives is useless since it can't be implemented on your next one.”

🎁 Boost

85/100

“Fortunately, Dassero gives a ton of !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • She is never in a bad mood & always has a smile on her face.
  • She made material so interesting and exciting that I wanted to go to every class.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A if you put in the work.
  • There is a strict no-late policy.
  • The and the work.

Theme 3

⚠️

  • so u don't get feedback to use til after with .
  • !
  • I have never had a teacher before who made me feel this way.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

30

Recent reviews read by the AI

30

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

30 reviews with both online and , and recurring themes give solid confidence despite polarity.

Inside 30 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 520
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 55

Course coverage

ENG1A13 reviews
ENG1B9 reviews
ENG13 reviews
ENG2002 reviews
1A1 review
Show 2 more courses
ENG3001 review
ENGLISH2001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

28 reported outcomes

A range

19

A+ 2 · A 16 · A- 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

6

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Incomplete 2 · Not sure yet 2