AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Erica Vogel

ANTH13 · ANTH2 · ANTH1 · ANTHRO1 · ANTH22 · CULTURALANTRHO · 119 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
85.71%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you will do the reading and write carefully without AI help; skip if you want a no-effort GE cruise.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring & AccessibleHeavy Reading LoadStrict on AI/PlagiarismClear InstructionsEngaging Ethnographies
  • Warm, responsive professor who makes anthropology interesting and manageable for most.
  • , and papers more than pure exams.
  • Harsh AI/plagiarism enforcement and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Quizzes and discussions are doable, but papers and AI scrutiny mean an A still requires careful original writing.

Online reviews report more ; in-person often feels easier if you attend and engage.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Interesting but , and multi-page writing.

Both formats stress get-ready-to-read; 8-week online/in-person intensives feel heavier.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

60/100

Many online and ; others require it or reward Zoom for DB exemption.

Online is more often optional; .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

Strong majority praise kindness and learning value (~86% would and AI complaints.

; online has more polarized AI/plagiarism backlash.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Often clear criteria and , but , and any AI-assisted writing.

Format shift

and AI flags generate .

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Weekly discussions plus substantial reading and .

Format shift

Online 8-week and writing-heavy ANTH2 sections feel heavier; some short medical anthro online feels light.

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

Described as , and engaging, with a minority calling lectures dry or disorganized.

Format shift

In-person praise for presence and events is stronger; online still rates .

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Mix of , and significant written projects or interviews.

Format shift

Online leans discussion boards and essays; and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

26 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person and hybrid experiences highlight caring , and interesting lectures with moderate workload for engaged students.

Main concern

and strict AI rules still apply; a minority find lectures dry or curriculum too political.

What students said

“One of the ! I looked forward to her class every week.”
ANTH2
“She is so strict on AI to the .”
ANTH1
“Loved the ethnographies and other readings for this class!”
ANTH13

Remote format

Online

24 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online sections are popular 8-week or async formats with clear modules, weekly DBs, quizzes, and papers; many call them manageable, but AI accusations and .

Main concern

Strict AI/plagiarism detection and .

What students said

“ and the class was low maintenance.”
ANTH2
“the . It dropped my 98% to a 84%”
ANTH1
“no matter what I tried, I kept being accused of Plagiarism.”
ANTH13

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; papers and AI policy drive more grade risk than pure exam format.

Lecture-based midterms and finalsShort response and multiple choiceTimed finals in some online sectionsMajor essays and research papersStrict AI/plagiarism checks

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

with short responses; fieldwork or group finals appear in some courses.

Lecture-based examsShort response itemsGroup or fieldwork projectsExtra credit events
“Midterm and ”
ANTH2
“ ”
ANTH13

Online

Online exams and essays can be timed and harshly screened for AI; .

Timed online finalEssay/exam AI scrutinyDiscussion boardsResearch paper
“She asks for specific examples from her lectures in the midterm and the ”
ANTH1
“Final Exam (48 questions under 60 minutes) and an Essay (10 pages)”
ANTH13

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“One of the ! I looked forward to her class every week.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting care, reading workload, and . Credibility rating: High.

❤️ Student Care

85/100

“She is very sweet and understanding. She always made me feel heard and supported.”

📖 Reading Load

52/100

“There's a lot of though.”

🚫 AI Crackdown

40/100

“She is so strict on AI to the .”

👍

82/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • kindest and is very passionate
  • fascinating readings
  • lectures aren't tediously long
  • super involved with the school

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • So easy. I took this course for a GPA boost

Theme 3

⚠️ About AI & Fairness

  • accused me of using ai and dropped my grade from an A to a B
  • kept being accused of Plagiarism
  • insane about ai so be prepared

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

119

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews with balanced online/in-person split, rich detail, and , and AI strictness.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 589
4 out of 516
3 out of 58
2 out of 52
1 out of 56

Course coverage

ANTH220 reviews
ANTH112 reviews
ANTH1311 reviews
ANTH224 reviews
CULTURALANTRHO2 reviews
Show 1 more courses
ANTHRO11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

46 reported outcomes

A range

33

A+ 13 · A 19 · A- 1

B range

8

B+ 3 · B 3 · B- 2

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 2