AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Patricia Shubert

MATH · MATH8 · MATH124 · MATH253 · MATH351 · INTERMEDALGEB · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid her current online math sections if and tests.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTest heavyUnclear homeworkFast paceIgnored accommodationsEra-split reviews
  • Recent online MATH124 reviews are strongly negative with multiple D grades and little support.
  • Exams often dominate the grade and .
  • Very old , but current take-again is 0%.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

22/100

Recent students report D and D+ outcomes with and .

Online recent reviews show hard As; older .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

, and exam-heavy structure make the material feel harder than the catalog level.

Online MATH124 is consistently hard; .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Online sections often list attendance as not mandatory, while .

Online leans optional; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

10/100

Would-take-again is 0% and recent comments repeatedly say stay far away.

; older in-person reviews were positive but outdated.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Students call her a question or course grade.

Format shift

Harshness is strongest in recent online MATH124; .

Workload

Moderate

40/100

and paired with many short videos, but the and mismatch.

Format shift

Online cites lots of homework and videos; .

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Recent students say , and pace blocks questions; only old reviews rave.

Format shift

Online recent reviews are near-uniformly poor; and strong historical praise.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Multiple reviews say exams are about 70% of the grade with quizzes and .

Format shift

; and graded by few things.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

modern comments cite fast pace and , while early 2000s , and beginner friendly.

Main concern

Pace and clarity problems for ; older praise may not reflect current practice.

What students said

“moves way too fast and does not let anyone get a word in when asking questions.”
MATH124
“She isn't very good at teaching in a .”
MATH8
“She gave detailed steps for each problem, showed how to attack the problem and gave plenty of examples.”
INTERMEDALGEB

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online MATH124 is described as unsupported and misaligned: slow videos, unclear homework, quizzes unlike practice, exams about 70% of grade, and ignored DSPS needs.

Main concern

No and assessments, and D-range outcomes.

What students said

“exams are 70% of the grade, and she ignored my DSPS accommodations.”
MATH124
“ .”
MATH124
“RUN FROM THIS TEACHER.”
MATH124

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and misaligned practice rather than clearly documented proctoring tools.

Exams 70% of gradeQuizzes unlike homeworkTest heavyUnclear alignment

Assessment risk

Standard

38/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and fast lectures, but do not clearly document proctoring software.

Test heavyFast-paced examsAttendance-linked success
“Skip class? You won't pass., ”
MATH8
“moves way too fast and does not let anyone get a word in when asking questions.”
MATH124

Online

Online students repeatedly report , and little support before high-stakes tests.

Exams 70%Misaligned quizzesShort slow videos
“ , and exams are 70% of the grade.”
MATH124
“one little mistake cost you the .”
MATH124

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“STAY ”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews (5 online, 7 in person), weighting recent online MATH124 more heavily than 2005-era praise. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Recommendation Collapse

10/100

“ and professor at all costs.”

📝

38/100

“exams are 70% of the grade.”

📉 Teaching Support

28/100

“No support, unresponsive, and ignored DSPS accommodations.”

🕰️ Old Praise Contrast

70/100

“Really if you aren't good at math!!!”

Theme 1

💻 About Online MATH124

  • Videos are short but painfully slow
  • First D I've ever received

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Clarity

  • moves way too fast
  • She isn't very good at teaching in a
  • She taught as if you had no understanding of math

Theme 3

📈 About Grades and Work

  • Lots of homework
  • Test heavy

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

12 reviews cover a long time span with a sharp old-versus-new split, so recent online MATH124 patterns are useful but historical praise may be stale.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 56

Course coverage

MATH1246 reviews
MATH3512 reviews
INTERMEDALGEB1 review
MATH1 review
MATH2531 review
Show 1 more courses
MATH81 review

Reported outcomes

D range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

5

D+ 2 · D 3

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values