AI Rate Professor

English

Megan Friess

ENG1A · ENGLC1001H · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
36/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Prefer her in person if you want structure and feedback; treat online sections as high-risk for and policy friction.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHarsh Online GraderAI Suspicion RiskFormat PolarizingStrong Essay FeedbackCanvas Lock Friction
  • and effort-for-A outcomes.
  • Online reviews warn about zeroed work, , and rigid late policy.
  • Overall experience is sharply split by format, so recommendation is not one-size-fits-all.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

In person, effort can yield an A, but online strictness and AI suspicion make a high grade uncertain.

; online students report harsh zeros and drops.

Is the course easy?

Standard

44/100

Material is not described as conceptually impossible, but workload and policy rigidity raise real friction.

but abundant; online focuses on policy difficulty more than content.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

42/100

and mixed online, with limited overall flexibility language.

In-person flags lean mandatory; online is mixed optional and mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

.

; and Canvas policy.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

24/100

Online reports of zeroed essays for suspected AI and .

Format shift

; online grading is described as punitive.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Multiple essays and .

Format shift

Both formats mention substantial writing; online adds locked weekly pacing.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

In-person enthusiasm and , but online strictness and low personability pull the overall experience down.

Format shift

Teaching quality reads high in person and low to mixed online.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

Essays and ; one online tag set mentions tests but comments stay writing-centered.

Format shift

; online also centers writing assignments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students call her fantastic and but manageable essays and .

Main concern

Homework and .

What students said

“Although I didn't enjoy the class, Professor Friess was a fantastic professor.”
ENG1A
“Respect + Effort = Easy A.”
ENG1A

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online experience is mixed-to-negative with reports of AI-based zeros, locked weekly content, strict lateness, and low personability.

Main concern

Zero for suspected AI without proof and .

What students said

“she gave me a zero on because she suspected AI with no proof and will not hear anything else about it.”
ENGLC1001H
“her online courses actually lock Canvas—you can only access this week's course content during this week”
ENGLC1001H
“Not personable, stricter than most teachers”
ENG1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

suspicion and rigid access rules, even when assessment is paper-based.

Essay HeavyAI Scrutiny RiskStrict Late PolicyLocked Weekly Canvas Online

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and no clear proctoring software mentions.

Multiple EssaysStrong FeedbackHomework Supports Essays
“There were 4 essays to write in 1 semester”
ENG1A
“ ”
ENG1A

Online

Online reviews highlight AI suspicion zeros, strict late policy, and weekly locked Canvas content.

AI Suspicion ZerosLocked Weekly CanvasStrict Late Policy
“she suspected AI with no proof and will not hear anything else about it.”
ENGLC1001H
“you can only access this week's course content during this week, with no way to get ahead.”
ENGLC1001H

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Absolutely do not take this English professor she gives you a if you do not follow her expectations perfectly.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, . Credibility rating: Medium.

⚠️ Online Strictness Risk

24/100

“she suspected AI with no proof and will not hear anything else about it.”

🏫

70/100

“Professor Friess was a fantastic professor.”

🧭 Format-Dependent Recommendation

45/100

“Respect + Effort = Easy A.”

Theme 1

💻 About Online Policy

  • lock Canvas
  • strict late submission policy
  • stricter than most teachers

Theme 2

✍️

  • There were 4 essays to write in 1 semester
  • Respect + Effort = Easy A.

Theme 3

⚖️ About Risk

  • gave me a mark on my permanent record
  • Not personable

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Six reviews are recent and detailed enough to show a , but sample size remains modest.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENG1A4 reviews
ENGLC1001H2 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 2

B range

1

B- 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 2