AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Stephanie Chhun

PSYCH1 · PSYCH37 · SOC105 · PSYC3715840 · PSYC1 · PSYC37 · PSYC7 · 30 lifetime ratings

AI rating
46/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
52%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Consider her for intro psych if you like lectures and study guides; be cautious with PSYC37 online where grading and support get sharp criticism.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarized reviewsTough grader on papersTest-heavy coursesMixed lecture qualityExtra credit helps
  • PSYC1 and some online sections get warm praise for clarity, humor, and .
  • PSYC37 draws , and grades hinging on few tests or a big project.
  • , so experience depends heavily on course and format.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Intro sections can be easy As with study guides and EC, but PSYC37 often needs hard work for B/A .

Some online intro reports are easy; online and in-person PSYC37 feel harder to earn an A.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Content ranges from straightforward intro psych to denser abnormal psych with heavy lecture and testing.

Online intro can feel light; PSYC37 in both formats feels more demanding.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

but skipping hurts tests.

Online often optional; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

; praise for intro clashes with strong avoid comments on PSYC37.

; in-person intro is more recommendable.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

38/100

Tough grader tags and no rounding are common; helps but papers and .

Format shift

Online PSYC37 criticism is harshest; .

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Often few assignments but and a .

Format shift

Some online sections have lots of homework; .

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

and complaints of disorganization, rushing, or not teaching.

Format shift

Online has more extreme negatives; in-person intro is warmer overall.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Grades often rest on a handful of assignment buffer.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize tests and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

22 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and sweet with study guides, while abnormal psych is lecture-heavy and grade recovery is hard after weak tests or projects.

Main concern

and grades based on few high-stakes items.

What students said

“her lectures are given in a . very easy to understand.”
PSYC1
“ and projects and recovering was hard.”
PSYC37
“She is such a sweet person, but I was very disappointed by her lectures and teaching style.”
PSYC37

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

some easy organized psych courses, others , and .

Main concern

and uneven instruction on PSYC37/online upper sections.

What students said

“I took her class online and was a very easy and enjoyable class.”
PSYC1
“ ! She is short in her response if you have a .”
33
“Acted like she wanted you to fail. . Very rude.”
PSYC37

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are central and study-guide based; reviews do .

Study GuidesTest HeavyExtra Credit on ExamsLecture-based Exams

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and study guides with occasional strikeouts for ; grade recovery after a bad project is hard.

Study GuidesStrikeouts for Free PointsFew High-Stakes Items
“ if you look over the study guide topics.”
PSYC1
“she does strikeouts for .”
PSYCH1
“ is offered but your grade is and a project.”
PSYC37

Online

Online comments and tests more than proctoring details; policies are not clearly proven beyond standard online quizzes/exams.

Test HeavyHarsh Assignment Grading
“Graded assignments so so many little things it was so hard to get a good grade”
PSYC37
“assignments, quizzes and and straightforward.”
PSYC7

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Great psychologist, terrible instructor.”

Voice snapshots generated from 30 reviews with strong intro-vs-PSYC37 split. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“her lectures are given in a . very easy to understand.”

👎 Course Polarization

40/100

“Acted like she wanted you to fail. . Very rude.”

⚖️

38/100

“Graded assignments so so many little things it was so hard to get a good grade”

👍 When It Works

70/100

“She's a . She's really sweet and caring.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she does an amazing job explaining everything
  • seems like she just winged it every time she came to class
  • She didn't teach.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • getting an A is easy.
  • and projects and recovering was hard.
  • she does offer lots of opportunities.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Support

  • .
  • If you still have a question she just ignores it.
  • professor wasn't that helpful either

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

30

Recent reviews read by the AI

30

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty reviews with mixed recent detail and ; tone is inconsistent by class.

Inside 30 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 53
3 out of 57
2 out of 53
1 out of 56

Course coverage

PSYC3718 reviews
PSYC14 reviews
PSYC37158402 reviews
PSYCH12 reviews
331 review
Show 3 more courses
PSYC71 review
PSYCH371 review
SOC1051 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

26 reported outcomes

A range

14

A+ 2 · A 11 · A- 1

B range

7

B+ 2 · B 5

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

3

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 2