AI Rate Professor

Ethnic Studies

Marie Nubia-Feliciano

ES1 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.1/5
Take again
6.25%
Difficulty
4.8

The decision

if you can; students overwhelmingly warn to drop or pick anyone else for ES1.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderVague instructionsHeavy paper loadMinimal feedbackAvoid if possible
  • Near-universal quality 1 ratings with extreme difficulty and
  • Students , and poor communication
  • Interesting ethnic studies topics feel ruined by workload and unsupportive teaching

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Even capable students report C, F, incomplete, or and ; A is rare and hard-won.

; one online student still got A- while calling workload the downside.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

10/100

, and tight timelines make content and pacing extremely demanding.

Online and and reading load.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

; the bigger issue is rigid deadlines rather than seat time alone.

In-person more often mandatory; online is mixed but still deadline-strict.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Almost no one would take her again; and .

Only one online review is mildly positive; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

8/100

Tough grader tags dominate; students say late penalties and little recourse.

Format shift

Online and ; one review found grading fair but still heavy.

Workload

Overwhelming

8/100

Multiple same-week essays, 20+ page annotations, constant readings and podcasts with no buffer.

Format shift

Online weekly unlock-to-Friday crunch is especially severe; .

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Students describe unprofessional feedback, unhelpful lectures, vague instructions, and a lack of support when they struggle.

Format shift

One online student found lectures helpful; nearly all other voices call teaching poor to awful.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Course is driven by papers, annotations, and content consumption rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

Both formats are paper and reading heavy; exams are barely mentioned.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

: terrible lectures, many papers, vague rubrics, and harsh grading with almost no support.

Main concern

, and demoralizing classroom experience.

What students said

“Definitely the .”
ES1
“if i could give a Zero i would. This teacher deserves to be fired”
ES1
“Many papers (with terrible rubric) - Bad feedback (1-2 sentences)”
ES1

Remote format

Online

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online ES1 is described as a barrage of articles, podcasts, and same-week multi-page essays with late penalties, AI accusations, and .

Main concern

Vague directions, harsh late policy, AI accusations, and .

What students said

“ , and they would be due Friday.”
ES1
“Accuses of using AI for no reason, while her syllabus is likely written by AI.”
ES1
“ .”
ES1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on papers and annotations rather than formal exams, so and secondary to essay risk.

Essay-heavy assessmentWeekly papersAnnotationsNo clear proctoring details

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and terrible rubrics rather than describing formal exam proctoring.

Many papersVague rubricsLittle exam detail
“ ”
ES1
“she .”
ES1

Online

Online evidence centers on multi-page essays and annotations due the same week; .

3-page minimum essays20+ page annotationsSame-week deadlines
“Most of the assignments were either 3 page minimum essays or 20+ page annotations due the same week.”
ES1
“she also posts a ton of 3 page essays that are due the same week theyre assigned.”
ES1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !!! if there's no alternative.”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 highly consistent negative reviews on ES1 workload, grading, and support. Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Recommendation

8/100

“ .”

⚖️

8/100

“she grades hard, .”

📚 Overwhelming Workload

8/100

“Most of the assignments were either 3 page minimum essays or 20+ page annotations due the same week.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

12/100

“This was the life.”

Theme 1

⚠️

  • You must read her mind to get a .
  • Bad feedback (1-2 sentences)
  • The directions are extremely vague

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • , and if you turned in anything late you were marked down 20%
  • .
  • lack of makes it difficult for students to raise their grades

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • some of the annotations are 20+ pages.
  • barrage of videos, articles and podcasts

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

85/100

Evidence confidence

16 highly consistent negative reviews with , and instruction quality across recent terms.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 515

Course coverage

ES116 reviews

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

2

A- 2

B range

3

B+ 2 · B- 1

C range

4

C 2 · C- 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1