AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Jonathan Luque

MATH124 · MATH3B · MATH103 · MATH11 · MATH26 · MATH10 · MATH3A · 71 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
52.38%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

if you will use office hours and ; avoid if you need hand-holding for Easy A.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarizing math instructorTest-heavy gradingOffice hours lifelineSelf-teach online riskConcept mastery over plug-and-chug
  • ; many slam harsh assessments that .
  • Grade often driven by few exams with .
  • Online or asynchronous formats draw the harshest no-teach complaints.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

As and high grades exist for diligent students, but tough assessments and little room for error make an A hard-earned.

Online MATH11 reviews are especially harsh on assessments; .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Calc and stats content is hard and fast; and practice constantly.

Difficulty is high in both formats; online adds self-teaching burden.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

48/100

; some say optional and some say skip class and you will not pass.

In person often pushes attendance; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

; success depends on self-motivation and heavy office-hour use.

; many .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

and harsh conceptual assessments with limited partial credit for some.

Format shift

Online assessments are widely called harsh; and partial credit.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Lots of , and multiple exams; but still required.

Format shift

Both formats report heavy HW and test weight.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

and clear moments for .

Format shift

In person averages higher praise; online draws more no-teach complaints.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Exams, topic tests, assessments, and .

Format shift

Consistent across formats that few high-stakes items decide the grade.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

35 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In person is more positive overall for students who engage, with and clearer lectures for .

Main concern

Lectures can feel monologue-heavy and .

What students said

“Luque is a phenomenal professor who .”
MATH3A
“The content is challenging but and .”
MATH26
“great human being with a strong love of mathematics; however, he does struggle to make class engaging.”
MATH3B

Remote format

Online

15 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online and hybrid experiences are highly mixed, with several students saying they had to teach themselves and faced harsh assessments.

Main concern

Assessments and ; many urge avoidance online.

What students said

“ . Does not teach at all. Had to teach everything to myself.”
MATH11
“The "assessments" are absolutely nothing like the ”
MATH11
“ and ), however he was always willing to help”
MATH3A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam-heavy courses with mixed fairness; .

Multiple examsTopic retakes sometimesAssessments mismatch HWOpen notes quizzes sometimes

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In , and homework-based test questions for some sections.

4 testsTopic retakesHomework-based exams
“The final is in essence a , however if you like your grade .”
MATH3A
“ . .”
MATH3A

Online

Online students report conceptual assessments and .

Harsh assessmentsSelf-taught modulesFinal project
“ but .”
MATH11
“module assessments are graded on accuracy yet test you on things that are not taught within the course.”
MATH11

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“All these bad reviews are just salt students who didnt get an A.Luque is a phenomenal professor who .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting polarizing teaching and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“overall, great human being with a strong love of mathematics; however, he does struggle to make class engaging.”

📝 Assessment Risk

32/100

“"Assessments" were on things never taught in the and graded harshly.”

🤝 Office Hours Help

70/100

“he is very helpful and .”

👍 Recommendation Split

52/100

“I would stay away from this professor if possible!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He's one of !
  • Did not teach. NOTHING tested was ever in practice modules.
  • and he specifically tells you what is expected

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • and allows almost no room for error
  • Do the , and !
  • .

Theme 3

⚠️

  • Avoid.
  • and you won't be disappointed
  • I advise anyone and everyone to stay away from this teacher.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

71

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews spanning years with and solid format coverage.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 529
4 out of 511
3 out of 54
2 out of 56
1 out of 522

Course coverage

MATH3A16 reviews
MATH1113 reviews
MATH1011 reviews
MATH264 reviews
MATH1033 reviews
Show 2 more courses
MATH3B2 reviews
MATH1241 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

46 reported outcomes

A range

15

A+ 5 · A 10

B range

14

B+ 4 · B 9 · B- 1

C range

7

C+ 3 · C 2 · C- 2

D range

2

D 2

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

8

Drop/Withdrawal 5 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1