AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Andrew Ronquillo

PHIL15 · PHIL1 · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if you want a demanding philosophy course with heavy weekly work; .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy weekly workloadPolarizing onlineDetailed feedbackTough final papersReading-intensive
  • and strong lecture design, others call the load brutal.
  • Weekly reading plus many assignments and a .
  • , so fit depends on whether you want a serious philosophy GE.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

Even A students describe , and .

Nearly all evidence is online; the one .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Students repeatedly call the course demanding, reading-heavy, and mentally taxing for a GE.

Online reviews dominate the difficulty picture.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

52/100

while others are asynchronous with no live requirement.

Online evidence is mixed; the .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

; enthusiasts love design and feedback while .

Recommendation split is almost entirely from online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

Rubrics and , but many call him a .

Format shift

Online reviews drive the strict-grader narrative; .

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Multiple weekly assignments, long lectures, dense readings, and .

Format shift

Workload complaints are concentrated in online PHIL-1 and PHIL-15 reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

54/100

Some students find lectures thoughtful and accessible; .

Format shift

Positive design comments and communication complaints both come mainly from online sections.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Weekly homework, participation, and .

Format shift

Online and the single in-person .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Single in-person review reports an A-to-F crash on the .

Main concern

and reverse the course grade.

What students said

“Had an A the a F.”
PHIL-15

Remote format

Online

17 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

structured weekly lectures and and poorly aligned for others.

Main concern

, and occasional non-response or AI accusation complaints.

What students said

“Expect to have at least 4- 6 assignments due every week, and 5-8 hours of lecture and reading as well.”
PHIL-1
“the final was a 13-page essay deconstructing an argument.”
PHIL-15
“Professor Ronquillo is quite caring and and every assignment.”
PHIL-1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment risk centers on heavy writing and a .

Large final essayWeekly written assignmentsRubric gradingVideo lectures

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

collapsed an A into an F; other exam details are not stated.

High-stakes final essay
“ a F”
PHIL-15

Online

Online reviews emphasize weekly written work and long final essays; .

Weekly assignmentsFinal paperVideo lecturesRubrics
“the final was a 13-page essay deconstructing an argument.”
PHIL-15
“Don't forget about that !”
PHIL-1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ IF YOU TAKE MULTIPLE CLASSES. The workload will ruin EVERY OTHER GRADE!!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 reviews (17 online, 1 in , and polarized outcomes. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

54/100

“It is obvious, the immense effort the Professor put into designing the online course, and, personally, I'm grateful.”

📚 Workload Reality

24/100

“Expect to have at least 4- 6 assignments due every week, and 5-8 hours of lecture and reading as well.”

⚖️

34/100

“Had an A the a F.”

👍 Recommendation Split

50/100

“Professor Ronquillo is one of the !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • weekly lecture videos assist with completing the assignments
  • Lectures are easy to understand
  • Video lectures were

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • definitely not an easy class
  • Genuinely painful to get through this course

Theme 3

💬 About Communication

  • and every assignment
  • always got back to me quickly, and was happy to do Zoom calls

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

18 recent reviews with but a sharp split and .

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 57

Course coverage

PHIL-1511 reviews
PHIL-17 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

11

A 10 · A- 1

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 2