AI Rate Professor

Graphic Arts

Louis Bispo

GD199 · GD145 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
85.71%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

design studio; budget for supplies and stay on top of projects.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlySupportive Studio MentorGreat Project FeedbackCreative FreedomSupply Cost HelperRedo Friendly
  • In-person students rave , and fun studio projects.
  • Work is fairly easy but can pile up if you fall behind; extensions and redos are common.
  • Main downsides are material costs and one harsh online review about gouache, late due-date changes, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

, and many A/A+ grades make high marks reachable with consistent studio work.

In person evidence drives the easy-A picture; the sole online review ended Incomplete and felt much harder.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

Content is approachable and fun for newcomers, though skills like Illustrator and gouache still need practice.

In person calls work fairly easy; online described non-digital drawing/painting as harder and costly.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

as mandatory and tags warn skip class and you will not pass.

Both the online review and .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Six of ; only the online Incomplete review says no.

In person is nearly unanimous MustTake energy; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

80/100

Redos past due with , and constructive feedback; one online report of .

Format shift

In person lenient and feedback-rich; .

Workload

Moderate

58/100

; fun but can overwhelm if you fall behind.

Format shift

In person stresses manageable lab time; online felt high difficulty and cost pressure.

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Students call him calm, kind, inspiring, and hands-on, often doing projects alongside the class.

Format shift

In person excellent; the one online review strongly disagrees.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Grades center on a few projects and .

Format shift

In person project-based; online also few graded items but .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In person studio is fun, calm, and , and creative freedom.

Main concern

Supplies can be pricey even when he helps find deals.

What students said

“You can tell he really cares. He created a ”
GD145
“he will let you redo or correct a project even if it is past due date as long as you give him prior notice”
GD145
“Lot of creative freedom in projects. .”
GD199

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Single online review is strongly negative on cost, , and last-minute due dates.

Main concern

Expensive required materials revealed late and .

What students said

“REQUIRED materials ($$$$$) you don't find out about until day 1.”
GD145
“Doesn't grade until the end of dates last minute.”
GD145

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Studio assessment is project and stress in the reviews.

Project BasedNo Exam EmphasisRedo AllowedLab Time

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

85/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person work is a handful of projects plus small related assignments with lab time and .

Project BasedLab TimeRedos Allowed
“There are only 3 projects with .”
GD145
“he will let you redo or correct a project even if it is past due date”
GD145

Online

Online review does not describe traditional exams; changes.

Graded by Few ThingsEnd of Term Grading
“Doesn't grade until the end of dates last minute.”
GD145

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Overall, a very calm and and will inspire you as well.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews (1 online, 6 in person), weighting the while noting the online outlier. Credibility rating: Medium.

❤️

90/100

“You can tell he really cares. He created a ”

👍 Recommendation

88/100

“I will be taking him again and am very grateful it's with him. !”

🎨 Creative Freedom

85/100

“Lot of creative freedom in projects. .”

💸 Supply Cost Risk

40/100

“REQUIRED materials ($$$$$) you don't find out about until day 1.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he will help you with anything! Will repeat things if needed :)
  • He does the and helpful.
  • and .

Theme 2

📈 About Workload & Grades

  • Fairly easy work, but will add up and overwhelm if you fall behind.
  • he will let you redo or correct a project even if it is past due date
  • I .

Theme 3

💵 About Costs

  • Yes supplies might be costly but he helps us research options
  • Some materials are a little pricy but the teacher helps you find cheaper alternatives.
  • REQUIRED materials ($$$$$) you don't find out about until day 1.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Only 7 reviews, six strongly consistent in person and one opposing online outlier; detail is good but sample is small.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

GD1456 reviews
GD1991 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 2 · A 2

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Incomplete 2