AI Rate Professor

History

Aura Popa

HIS4 · HISTHIST · HIST4 · HISTO4 · HIST62 · HISTORY62 · HIST5 · HISTORY17 · HIST63 · 45 lifetime ratings

AI rating
41/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
42.11%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Only take if and can write professional discussion posts; skip if .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy readingTough discussion graderStrong accentTextbook-driven onlinePolarizing clarity
  • Course is reading- and
  • and fair work if they follow instructions exactly
  • Accent, vague expectations, and

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

As are possible by following exact discussion and reading rules, but , and unforgiving of tiny mistakes.

; some older in-person students still report easy As via PowerPoints.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Heavy weekly reading, dense discussions, and sometimes compressed 8-week pacing make content .

; and quizzes.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Several sections mark attendance not mandatory or online-flexible, while and call students out.

; in-person reports are mixed.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Would-take-again near 42% with a and students who feel graded unfairly.

A few strong online recommendations exist, but .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

28/100

, and point loss for tiny discussion mistakes dominate recent reviews.

Format shift

; some older in-person comments call her lenient with study guides.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Lots of , and essays make the weekly workload heavy.

Format shift

Online and condensed 8-week sections feel especially overloaded.

Teaching experience

Poor

40/100

Knowledgeable and occasionally inspiring, but accent barriers, boring lectures, and .

Format shift

In-person accent complaints are frequent; online and syllabus clarity.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of discussion boards, weekly quizzes, essays, and .

Format shift

Online leans discussion plus quiz; and papers.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

36 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person history is often called boring or due to accent, with ; older reviews sometimes call her nice and easy with PowerPoints.

Main concern

Accent comprehension and .

What students said

“She does not make it clear what she wants in the discussions.”
HIST62
“She's so passionate about the subject and it comes through in her lectures.”
HIST4
“ . Her teaching style is terrible, she cant speak English.”
HIST4

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online European/world history is textbook-centered with , and mixed fairness ratings.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“You will never have to work harder for .”
HIST62
“Lots of but also lots of reminders to get the work done.”
HIST63
“If you want an A, and you should, you will have to earn it.”
HIST4

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Standard history mix of quizzes, discussions, essays, and a final; .

Weekly quizzesDiscussion boardsEssayMultiple-choice finalStudy guides

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

PowerPoint-based quizzes/tests, papers, and some in-class discussion midterms; friendliness varies by semester.

PowerPoint quizzesIn-class discussion midtermPaperAttendance-linked
“ . You'll need to study harder for the midterm, which is an in-class discussion.”
HIST5
“go to class everyday because her ppt's are all the .”
HIST4

Online

weekly quizzes, heavy , and ; proctoring tools not clearly stated.

Weekly quizzesDiscussion boardsEssayMultiple-choice finalExtra credit
“A lot of , an essay, and multiple-choice final.”
HIST62
“Lots of reading, weekly quizzes and and essay.”
HIST63

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You will never have to work harder for .”

Voice snapshots generated from 45 reviews, focusing , and accent-related lecture friction. Credibility rating: High.

📚 Reading Marathon

30/100

“You will end up reading an entire text book by the end of the course.”

📝

28/100

“She expects perfection and will mark you down on the most minuscule mistakes.”

🗣️ Accent Barrier

40/100

“WATCH OUT FOR HER ACCENT!!! It is hard to understand & strong.”

👍 Fair If You Follow Instructions

55/100

“There were no surprises, everything was clearly explained in her syllabus.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She's so passionate about the subject and it comes through in her lectures.
  • Her lectures add nothing in the two minutes she gives.
  • Excellent emeritus professor

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • The course itself .
  • Not going to happen in this class. If you want an A, and you should, you will have to earn it.
  • Write PROFESSIONALLY! Not nice.

Theme 3

📖 About Workload

  • A LOT reading.
  • There are and LOTS of reading.
  • 3-7 hours-per week studying.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

45

Recent reviews read by the AI

45

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

45 reviews across , and accent issues, supporting a stable Medium-Low experience score.

Inside 45 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 510
3 out of 55
2 out of 59
1 out of 512

Course coverage

HIST416 reviews
HIST6212 reviews
HIST56 reviews
HIST634 reviews
HISTO42 reviews
Show 4 more courses
HISTORY622 reviews
HIS41 review
HISTHIST1 review
HISTORY171 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 3 · A 6 · A- 1

B range

3

B 3

C range

3

C+ 1 · C- 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 1