AI Rate Professor

Art

Latonja Davis

Courses not reported · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if and hard deadlines without much grade rescue.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough GraderPicky ExpectationsOnline Art ProjectsPolarized FeedbackClear Only If Self-Paced Fit
  • Small sample of four online ART reviews only, so confidence is limited.
  • One student loved flexible pacing and ; .
  • Project submission standards and deadline rigidity are the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

45/100

One student earned an A+ with flexible pacing, but others and could not raise scores.

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

as conceptually brutal, but high expectations make the course feel harder than difficulty alone suggests.

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

78/100

Most comments mark attendance not mandatory for the online format, with .

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Only one of four reviews is strongly positive; the rest warn about pickiness, rigidity, or .

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

; and high project standards are hard to recover from.

Format shift

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

least one complaint about spring-break deadlines.

Format shift

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

one student felt supported, others felt unreasonably particular and unclear.

Format shift

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Assessment centers on art projects and .

Format shift

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online ART 2-D style work feels easy for self-paced students who match her standards, but and rigid deadlines frustrate others.

Main concern

and tough regrade policy can trap students who miss her exact expectations.

What students said

“She grades very nicely and allows us to get through the class at our own tempo.”
10985
“she assigned work that was due during spring break and refused to change the deadline”
10985
“she doesn't give a ”
10985

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on projects and regime.

Project BasedSubmission Standards Strict

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online evidence emphasizes project submissions and .

Project SubmissionsNo Clear Exam Policy Stated
“I see that many of .”
10985
“she doesn't give a ”
10985

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ unless you feel that you are prepared and a good fit for her expectations.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 online-only reviews with low sample size. Credibility rating: Low.

⚖️

28/100

“This professor is unreasonably particular.”

👍 Flexible Pacing Praise

80/100

“She grades very nicely and allows us to get through the class at our own tempo.”

📅 Deadline Rigidity

25/100

“she assigned work that was due during spring break and refused to change the deadline to something more rational”

Theme 1

🎨

  • unreasonably particular
  • doesn't give a
  • but really are not

Theme 2

📉 About Grades & Flexibility

  • refused to change the deadline
  • All scores will remain
  • grades very nicely

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only four recent online reviews with mixed detail and .

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

109854 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Incomplete 1