AI Rate Professor

Health Science

Christine Coy

FN50 · FN1441 · FN64 · COS126 · FN64AND205 · HEALTH · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
40%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you care about nutrition content and ; skip if you want an easy GE.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarizing nutrition instructorTough precise graderHeavy weekly assignmentsQuiz-based testsMonotone lectures
  • Reviews and boring/unprepared criticism.
  • Workload is often tedious with , and quizzes.
  • Recent online FN50 feedback and useless busywork.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

As reachable, but others say even full work only yields a .

In-person is mixed on ease; recent online As.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content itself is basic nutrition for many, but dense weekly tasks and .

Online feels harder due to volume; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and tags warn that skipping hurts.

Evidence is mostly in-person; online notes are mixed.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

36/100

About 40% would take again and recent comments often say .

; in-person opinions are split.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

Tough-grader and , and some say grades barely move despite completed work.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize hard precise grading .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students repeatedly report tons of , and long quizzes.

Format shift

Both formats feel assignment-heavy; .

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Praise for knowledge and care is canceled out by frequent notes of monotone delivery, weak answers, and disorganization.

Format shift

In-person is polarized; the two online reviews are both negative.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Weekly homework and articles share weight with and .

Format shift

; online also feels test/homework heavy.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person nutrition classes range from easy quiz-heavy and , and grade-frustrating.

Main concern

Inconsistent teaching energy and .

What students said

“Professor Coy is awesome! She is very sweet and caring.”
FN64
“ .”
FN50
“Boring, monotone most of the time.”
FN50

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Recent online FN50 reviews are strongly , and poor textbook usefulness.

Main concern

High time cost for rigid assignments and .

What students said

“She's a and is very precise on how she wants the ”
FN50
“myriad of often irrelevant assignments that to complete”
FN50

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams often reuse quiz questions, which can be student-friendly, but and .

Weekly online quizzesMidterm/final from past quizzesArticle reviewsTedious assignments

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and ; policy details beyond that are limited.

Quizzes through BlackboardMidterm/final from quizzesArticle reviews
“ directly from quizzes verbatim.”
FN64
“She only tells you to study all the past quizzes, so be sure to save them afterwards.”
FN64
“ and .”
FN64

Online

Online evidence focuses on heavy weekly assignments and tests without proving proctoring tools.

Lots of homeworkTest heavyReading-heavy
“ , and having a myriad of often irrelevant assignments”
FN50
“She's a and is very precise on how she wants the ”
FN50

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Would not take this professor again. She's a and is very precise on how she wants the ”

Voice snapshots generated from 20 reviews (2 online, 18 in person), highlighting , and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“Professor Coy is awesome! She is very sweet and caring.”

👎 Recommendation Risk

36/100

“ .”

📚 Heavy Workload

28/100

“there are tons of .”

⚖️

34/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • very sweet and caring
  • Boring, monotone most of the time
  • knowledgable and tries to help us understand

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • you really do have to work for your grade
  • I don't know how someone could not get an A or at least a B with minimal effort
  • most likely you'll only get a B

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • LOTS of
  • 8 article reviews, 4 assignments & nutrition topic report

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

20

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

20 reviews over many years with detailed workload and teaching comments show a stable polarized pattern, especially negative on recent online sections.

Inside 20 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 52
3 out of 53
2 out of 56
1 out of 52

Course coverage

FN509 reviews
FN646 reviews
FN14412 reviews
COS1261 review
FN64AND2051 review
Show 1 more courses
HEALTH1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2