AI Rate Professor

Information Science

AJ Edmonds

CIMA204 · CIM223A · CIMA106 · CIMP8A · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
1.4/5
Take again
14.29%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Avoid unless and only need the credit; expect little usable help from the professor.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnhelpfulSelf Teach RequiredHigh Drop RateUnorganizedNo Support
  • Most students say they learned more from YouTube than from the instructor.
  • , and .
  • One in-person Access course review is positive, but the overall pattern is strongly negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Grades are mixed and help is scarce, so earning a strong mark still requires self-driven struggle.

; the one in-person review earned an A.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content difficulty varies by course, but poor teaching support makes average material feel harder.

Online programming and database classes feel harder due to lack of help.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

80/100

Reported .

Both the limited in-person and online notes lean optional.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

14/100

; comments repeatedly say do not recommend the teacher or class.

Only the ; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

and complaints about unclear correction leave students stuck without fixes.

Format shift

Online comments dominate this strict signal.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Projects and , but volume is secondary to lack of guidance.

Format shift

; online focuses more on frustration than sheer volume.

Teaching experience

Awful

16/100

, and answers that do not solve problems.

Format shift

Online reviews are near-unanimously negative; .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Courses revolve around software projects and assignments rather than emphasized exams.

Format shift

Reviews mention projects and assignments across formats; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Single in-person MS Access review finds the course useful though .

Main concern

; sample size is only one review.

What students said

“ to complete.”
CIMA106

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online CIM and programming courses are widely described as and high attrition.

Main concern

Little instructional support when stuck, leading students to YouTube or withdrawal.

What students said

“This is definitely a self learning class because you do not receive support from the professor.”
cim223a
“I learned more from YouTube than her.”
CIMP8A
“The class started with 26 students but only had 7 in the end.”
CIMA204

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews ; assessment talk centers on projects.

Project BasedUnclear Exam Details

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The than exams.

Project Assignments
“ to complete.”
CIMA106

Online

Online reviews .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I learned more from YouTube than her.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews (6 online, 1 in person), highlighting support gaps and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Teaching Support

16/100

“This is definitely a self learning class because you do not receive support from the professor.”

👎 Recommendation

14/100

“ .”

📉 Retention Warning

20/100

“The class started with 26 students but only had 7 in the end.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching

  • and aloof.
  • YouTube.
  • , but does not answer the question.

Theme 2

📈 About Outcomes

  • Students dropped like flies.
  • Probably will passed with a good trade but not sure if I learned anything worthwhile.
  • if you want to learn how to use MS Access.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Seven recent reviews are directionally consistent on weak support, but the sample is small and mostly online.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 56

Course coverage

CIMP8A3 reviews
CIMA1062 reviews
cim223a1 review
CIMA2041 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1