AI Rate Professor

Speech

Tiffany Baggs

COMM1 · SPCH1 · SP1 · 61 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
16.67%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Avoid if you can; pick another COMM/Speech professor unless and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough GraderDisorganized CanvasNitpicky SpeechesUnclear InstructionsHostile Classroom
  • Most students , and harsh nitpicky speech grading.
  • few absences, and many call the climate rude or discriminatory.
  • A few students still earn As if and follow her exact format, but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Content can be easy, but and vague rules mean an A still takes constant format-perfect effort.

Online reviews more often report failing, zeroed speeches, or drops; fighting grades.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Public-speaking content is not conceptually hard, but , and should.

Both formats describe easy material with hard execution due to rules and organization, not abstract theory.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

Attendance is repeatedly described as and no real flexibility.

; online also often marks attendance mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

17/100

Would-take-again is about 17% and most comments urge choosing any other professor.

Negative recommendation is consistent online and in person, with only sparse positive outliers in person.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

and nitpicks on outfit, bullets, grammar, and .

Format shift

Online students stress zeroed speech videos and grammar hits; in-person students stress fight-every-grade and .

Workload

Heavy

36/100

Many speeches, reading, and back-to-back assignments create steady workload even when material is simple.

Format shift

and speech-video logistics; in-person piles speeches plus participation.

Teaching experience

Poor

22/100

Students widely report little teaching, messy Canvas, condescension, and .

Format shift

Online is called terrible for communication; a minority of .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and participation rather than traditional midterms or finals.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize graded speeches; online adds live-audience video requirements.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

41 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person sections still center on many graded speeches with picky dress and , and frequent complaints of rudeness and disorganization.

Main concern

Superiority complex, public call-outs, and while assignment expectations stay vague.

What students said

“ complex.”
COMM1
“ . Can only miss two classes then on the third .”
COMM1
“she will find and speaking manner.”
COMM1

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students report almost no real teaching, sassy or slow replies, speech-video rules that tank grades, and .

Main concern

, and poor communication make the online section especially risky.

What students said

“ ! She doesn't teach at all.”
COMM1
“Ask for and .”
COMM1
“ ”
SPCH1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mainly graded speeches with strict format rules rather than classic proctored exams.

Speech-based assessmentPicky delivery and dress rulesUnclear Canvas instructionsRedo allowed in some cases

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and formal attire rules, not clearly documented Lockdown or webcam exams.

Live speechesBusiness attire expectationsNitpicky delivery feedback
“ nitpicks, like "talking too fast".”
COMM1
“forces you to dress up in formal attire for speeches”
COMM1

Online

Online grades hinge on speech videos and assignment format details, with .

Speech video requirementsHarsh point deductionsPoor email response
“No matter how well you present your speeches she won't count them if there are not two people in the speech video.”
COMM1
“Deducts points for something as little as .”
COMM1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ complex. There is no information on Canvas for any of the assignments.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting , and climate concerns. Credibility rating: High.

⚠️ Teaching Quality

22/100

“Gave zero lectures ever. Verbally harassed multiple students in front of class.”

📉 Recommendation Rate

17/100

“ . DROP WHILE YOU STILL CAN”

📝

22/100

“she'll find .”

📌

12/100

“drops students for missing 3 classes”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She doesn't teach at all.
  • you have to teach yourself the entire time.
  • Each lesson was around 5 minutes.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Deducts points for something as little as .
  • If u didn't do the less than a B.
  • The hw is relatively easy, and as long as you try to do the work you'll get a good grade.

Theme 3

💔 About Classroom Climate

  • She is a major transphobe
  • consistently rude and discriminatory
  • the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

61

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

50 detailed reviews across years with , and classroom climate.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 52
3 out of 58
2 out of 58
1 out of 535

Course coverage

COMM145 reviews
SPCH14 reviews
SP11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

45 reported outcomes

A range

16

A 14 · A- 2

B range

16

B+ 5 · B 10 · B- 1

C range

4

C+ 2 · C 1 · C- 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

7

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 3 · Rather not say 1