AI Rate Professor

English

Eric Gregory

ENG390 · ENG1A · ENG1B · ENGL1B · 29 lifetime ratings

AI rating
64/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Take him if , and ; skip if you need high energy lectures or easy As.

Best fit · Effort For RewardEssay Rewrites AllowedDry But HelpfulClear RubricsParticipation HeavyGood Feedback
  • Many students improve college writing , and rewrite chances.
  • Attendance and participation often count heavily, and a dry monotone style turns some students off.
  • A minority call him an , but recent and online reviews lean more positive.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

54/100

Rewrites, rubrics, and help, but and participation can cap grades below an easy A.

Online rewrites often boost grades; one online review still claims an A is nearly impossible.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

reading and if you follow guidelines.

Online workload is often called moderate; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Attendance and participation frequently make up a large grade share, with zeros for missed days.

In-person participation is especially strict; .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

Most students who do the work and dryness.

Online lean more recommend; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

and rewrites balance a reputation as a .

Format shift

Online feedback is often nurturing; .

Workload

Moderate

48/100

and group activities; heavy but expected for English.

Format shift

Both formats center essays; .

Teaching experience

Good

66/100

Dry and monotone for , and strong at writing feedback for many others.

Format shift

Online organization and videos get strong praise; in-person energy is more mixed.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

, and rewrites rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

Essay focus is consistent online and in person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

24 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person he is often dry but structured, with , and rewrites that raise grades.

Main concern

Participation points and .

What students said

“Allows rewrites, which helped improve my grade.”
ENG1A
“just be sure to attend class, as attendance/ participation is 20% of your grade.”
ENG1B
“ . He is an and not compassionate at all.”
ENG1B

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online sections are generally well organized with , and solid writing growth.

Main concern

One harsh review says full credit is nearly impossible and .

What students said

“Online class was well designed. .”
ENG1A
“Quite literally impossible to receive an A in this class as he had told I had one of the highest grades in the class with my 83.”
ENG1A
“My rewrites improved my grade. Lots of . Recommended!”
ENG1B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; exams are rarely the core threat.

Essay BasedRewrites AllowedPop Quizzes RareClear Rubrics

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

reading pop quizzes and strong participation grading.

Multiple EssaysEssay RewritesParticipation GradeOccasional Pop Quizzes
“ .”
ENG1B
“2 pop quizzes on reading (easy), 4 long essays, and 2 short essays.”
ENGL1B

Online

Online reviews emphasize essays, videos, and rewrites rather than proctored exams.

Essay RewritesOnline VideosClear Guidelines
“He gave all students the and that improved my grade from C+ to A-.”
ENG1A
“the instructor allows ”
ENG1B

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The instructor helped me improve my writing. I am better now at college writing.”

Voice snapshots generated from 29 reviews, highlighting writing growth, rewrites, and mixed engagement. Credibility rating: High.

✍️ Writing Growth

66/100

“I finally learned a .”

🔁 Rewrite Advantage

72/100

“Allows rewrites, which helped improve my grade.”

😴 Lecture Style

45/100

“He's very monotone, and generally unengaging.”

👍 Recommendation

68/100

“Recommended!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He has a dry sense of humor and .
  • Not the most dynamic speaker, but he made the class interesting.
  • super boring overall in class

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Allows rewrites, which helped improve my grade.
  • Quite literally impossible to receive an A in this class
  • He's a , but allows 2 essay rewrites to improve the grade.

Theme 3

📋

  • attendance/ participation is 20% of your grade.
  • (but that is to be expected from an english class)
  • No busywork. I learned a lot about thesis statements.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

29

Recent reviews read by the AI

29

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-nine reviews spanning many years show consistent essay-rewrite structure with mixed personality reactions.

Inside 29 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 512
3 out of 54
2 out of 52
1 out of 55

Course coverage

ENG1B18 reviews
ENG1A7 reviews
ENG3902 reviews
120801 review
ENGL1B1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

29 reported outcomes

A range

15

A 9 · A- 6

B range

13

B+ 1 · B 8 · B- 4

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values