AI Rate Professor

Humanities

Marley Rosner

HUM1 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
44/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
40%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

Only take him if you can write long, critical discussion posts every week and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough GraderDiscussion Board HeavyGet Ready to ReadNo TestsPolarizing
  • Grades rest almost entirely on weekly discussion .
  • Many students call him a and will not round borderline scores.
  • and an easy A if posts are thoughtful; .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

54/100

An A is reachable with thoughtful weekly posts, but tough scoring on discussions and the marks.

Most Easy-A claims come from online; the .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Workload is light, but readings and prompts feel needlessly complex for an introductory humanities GenEd.

Online reviews more often call topics boring or overcomplicated; .

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

88/100

Most students report discussion format.

Nearly all attendance evidence is .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

40/100

Take-again rate is low and , while a solid minority still call him caring and .

Online reviews are sharply split; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

; full credit on discussion boards is hard and borderline scores often stay unrounded.

Format shift

Both formats mention tough grading; online .

Workload

Light

72/100

Typical and a single final essay with no exams.

Format shift

Online and reading expectations.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Some praise clear audio lectures and care; , and a GenEd that feels pointless.

Format shift

Positive teaching comments appear in both formats, but .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

and papers; students repeatedly say there are no tests or quizzes.

Format shift

and in-person comments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and papers, interesting topics, and uneven grading that may block an A.

Main concern

Even full completion may not yield an A without pushing back on grades.

What students said

“ and papers.”
HUM1
“even if you do every assignment, he still wont give you an A.”
HUM1

Remote format

Online

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online HUM1 is asynchronous reading and ; experience splits between easy full-credit posts and impossible-to-please grading.

Main concern

and , so grades feel arbitrary.

What students said

“ . It's almost like he goes out of his way to make discussion board questions more complicated than they need to be.”
HUM1
“As long as you put some effort into the response, he was a .”
HUM1
“The class itself was very easy but you do not ever know how to do the .”
HUM1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Course is almost entirely discussion boards and .

No TestsNo QuizzesDiscussion BoardsFinal Essay

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

88/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

from discussion boards and papers.

No TestsDiscussion BoardsPapers
“ and papers.”
HUM1

Online

Online sections repeatedly report no tests or quizzes, only weekly discussions and a .

No TestsNo QuizzesWeekly Discussion BoardsFinal Essay
“The or quizzes, so our grade was primarily based on the discussion boards and one essay.”
HUM1
“The .”
HUM1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . It's almost like he goes out of his way to make discussion board questions more complicated than they need to be.”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews (13 online, 2 in , and polarized recommendation. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“This teacher does not give you any feedback at all on why you got the grade .”

👍 Recommendation Split

40/100

“ .”

📝

88/100

“ , so our grade was primarily based on the discussion boards and one essay.”

⚖️

32/100

“ . It's almost impossible to get 100% on a discussion board.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • his video lecture helped a lot
  • Rosner cares about the students and helping them grow
  • literally entire class used Ai cause absolutely nothing makes any sense

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • the class itself was very easy but you do not ever know how to do the
  • refused to round my overall grade from 89% to 90%
  • If you do your work and add thoughtful insight into it, you will be golden

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • little work and
  • plenty of reading and writing so be prepared
  • The class and then one 1,800 word paper

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Fifteen reviews spanning 2021-2026 with detailed comments, but opinions are highly polarized and almost all concern one course.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 51
3 out of 53
2 out of 51
1 out of 55

Course coverage

HUM115 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 2 · A 6

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 2 · B- 1

C range

2

C+ 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1