AI Rate Professor

Education

Christina Smith

CDE117 · CDE15 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
46/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
58.33%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you follow rubrics to the letter and ; online may feel easier than in person.

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough GraderPolarizingCaring to SomeParticipation MattersClear When Aligned
  • Online reviews often describe a straightforward asynchronous class with generous time and resubmits.
  • In-person and some online voices call her rude, picky, and a expectations.
  • and AI or Turnitin rules are strictly enforced.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

56/100

Many students earn As when work matches her exact standards, but picky deductions and perfectionist scoring make an A far from free.

Online has more easy-A success stories; .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Content and projects are usually straightforward reading, discussions, and .

Online calls the class quick and easy more often; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Multiple and some online sections.

In-person and ; a few online say no.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

; fans praise care and resubmits while critics urge avoiding her entirely.

Online lean more positive overall; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

Repeated tough-grader tags and reports of as expected.

Format shift

; online also stresses AI or plagiarism crackdowns.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Often a handful of discussions and a , though some report lots of homework and tests.

Format shift

Online more often describes light asynchronous work; .

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

and reports of rudeness, delayed emails, and .

Format shift

Online teaching praise is stronger; in-person comments more often cite annoyance and confusion.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Mix of discussion posts, projects, and .

Format shift

Online emphasizes discussions and projects; one .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

unclear instructions, eye-rolling, harsh point deductions, with a minority calling her friendly and clear.

Main concern

Perceived rudeness and .

What students said

“she would ROLL HER EYES when asked a stupid question.”
CDE15
“Save yourself the stress and .”
CDE15
“as long as you show up for class and listen to what she is teaching, you'll easily pass.”
CDE15

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online CDE sections range from quick, supportive asynchronous learning to harsh AI policing and .

Main concern

Strict Turnitin or AI detection and inflexible expectations can tank strong effort.

What students said

“Don't let bad reviews scare you!!”
CDE15
“ .”
CDE15
“ , if the and you put in so much work, she doesn't care”
CDE15

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on discussions and projects with strict originality checks; .

ProjectsDiscussion PostsTurnitin ChecksSome Tests

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a high-stakes final assignment more than specific exam software.

AssignmentsFinal AssignmentParticipation
“I missed the C the last week of class.”
CDE15

Online

Online evidence highlights discussions, projects, and strict AI or Turnitin .

Discussion PostsProjectsTurnitin AI ChecksResubmits Sometimes Allowed
“7 discussion posts and 3 major assignments.”
CDE15
“Will call you out and threaten to fail you if Turnitin detects even 10% of AI use or plagiarism”
CDE15

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Don't let bad reviews scare you!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews (7 online, 5 in person), highlighting . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“You can tell Professor Smith cares about her students and seeing them succeed.”

⚠️

34/100

“if it's not to her expectations she deducts a lot of points.”

👍 Recommendation Split

55/100

“ .”

📅

28/100

“as long as you show up for class and listen to what she is teaching, you'll easily pass.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • I have ENJOYED her teaching and assignments!!
  • She is all over the place in class
  • she is very friendly in class

Theme 2

📈 About Grades

  • I could resubmit it for a better grade
  • Hard to please with assignments

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Ms. and supportive
  • A absolute Karen
  • Shes great!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Twelve detailed reviews across online and in person from 2018-2025, but strong polarization lowers consistency.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

CDE1511 reviews
CDE1171 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 1 · A 6

B range

4

B+ 3 · B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values