AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Renata Cioczek-Georges

MA10 · STATS3020 · MATH124 · MATH253 · MATH170 · MATH251 · STATSC1000 · MATH120 · STAT108 · MATH10 · STATS · 51 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
10%
Difficulty
4.6

The decision

unless you already master the material and can teach yourself everything outside class.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough GraderIncomprehensible LecturesLots of HomeworkTest HeavyHigh Fail Rate
  • Most students report unreadable handwriting, a heavy accent, and lectures that leave them teaching themselves.
  • Tests and and harsh scoring even when answers are correct.
  • Attendance is treated as mandatory and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

harsh, and even correct methods can earn zero credit.

Both online and and low pass rates.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

12/100

Pace is extremely fast, lectures are , and students say they must already know the material.

Difficulty complaints dominate both formats, especially in-person stats and calculus support classes.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and skipping tanks your chance to pass.

In-person evidence is strongest; one .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

10/100

About 10% would take again and the dominant advice is to run or switch professors.

; online reviews are also negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Students repeatedly call her a and posts very low test averages.

Format shift

from in-person classes.

Workload

Overwhelming

12/100

Weekly homework, frequent quizzes, and .

Format shift

Lots of homework and .

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Students say , and often leave them feeling stupid for asking questions.

Format shift

In-person reviews drive this judgment; online comments mirror the same teaching issues.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Quizzes and 65% for tests and the final.

Format shift

and in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

48 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are overwhelmingly negative , and a high fail or drop rate.

Main concern

Students feel belittled, cannot follow lectures, and .

What students said

“WASTE OF TIME ENERGY AND THE $120 I SPENT ON THE DAMN TEXT BOOK. the test average every time was a 30%. RUN FOR YOUR LIFE.”
MATH124
“While this Professor is a phenomenal mathematician, she is a terrible teacher.”
MATH124
“Nobody can understand a word she says, since she mumbles with an accent while facing the board instead of the class.”
MATH10

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and little usable instruction, and students still felt they had to self-teach.

Main concern

Unclear lectures and .

What students said

“Her lectures did not make sense and if you looked away for 20 secs you wouldn't be able to get back on track.”
MATH124
“My classes first test score was a 48%. I am extremely confident in math and I got a 51%.”
MA10

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and occasional pop quizzes; friendliness is low.

Free-Response TestsPop QuizzesTest HeavyNotecard Sometimes Allowed

Assessment risk

Strict

22/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and quizzes are described as extremely hard with low class averages and strict scoring.

Free-Response TestsPop QuizzesLow Test Averages
“the test average every time was a 30%.”
MATH124
“ and all of .”
MATH170

Online

Online comments highlight high-stakes tests around 65% of the grade and little usable lecture support.

Test HeavyHigh Stakes Exams
“ , but tests were 65% of the grade.”
MATH124

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“While this Professor is a phenomenal mathematician, she is a terrible teacher. !”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, , and dropout pressure. Credibility rating: High.

💥 Teaching Quality

15/100

“She doesn't teach at all and just expects you to know everything already.”

🚫 Recommendation Rate

10/100

“RUN FOR YOUR LIFE. i can not stress enough literally just get in ur car and DRIVE THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION.”

📉 Getting an A

12/100

“3 ppl in my class of THIRTY FOUR passed.”

📚 Workload Pressure

12/100

“Lots of because there will be 7 questions but 14 parts to it.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • her thick accent and curvy handwriting makes it extremely difficult to understand the content
  • She'll have a
  • She scribbles all over the place making it hard to read

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • the test average every time was a 30%
  • Tests/Final is 65% of your grade
  • and her handwriting is impossible to read

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Climate

  • She has a serious attitude problem and will target you if you are not on task
  • she will scold you in front of everyone
  • makes you feel stupid when you ask questions

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

51

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews spanning many years show , and workload with few outliers.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 53
3 out of 54
2 out of 54
1 out of 539

Course coverage

MATH1022 reviews
MATH1248 reviews
MATH2537 reviews
MATH2513 reviews
MA102 reviews
Show 6 more courses
STATS2 reviews
statsc10002 reviews
MATH1201 review
MATH1701 review
STAT1081 review
STATS30201 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

34 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

5

B+ 1 · B 3 · B- 1

C range

9

C+ 4 · C 3 · C- 2

D range

4

D 2 · D- 2

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

11

Drop/Withdrawal 8 · Incomplete 2 · Not sure yet 1