AI Rate Professor

Design

Farida Gabdrakhmanova

ID111 · ID216 · ID110 · ID131 · ID129 · ID127 · ID210 · STUDIO1 · ID126 · ID132 · 36 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
88.24%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you want to grow as a designer and will put in the project work.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear RubricsGreat Design FeedbackProject HeavyCaring MentorSlow Grading Risk
  • Strong project-based interior design instruction with and feedback
  • Most students earn high grades with real effort and participation
  • and occasional long lectures

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Most reported grades are A or A+ when students complete projects and , though the work is not effortless.

Both online and ; one online Studio review was more negative.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Content is practical and well scaffolded, but and software skills still demand steady work.

Difficulty feels similar online and in person, with online software .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

as mandatory and stress participation throughout the semester.

as mandatory in both online and in-person formats.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Large majority call her one of the , and student investment.

Strong recommendations appear in both formats, with slightly more criticism in a few studio sections.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

and detailed feedback make grades feel fair and .

Format shift

A few reviews call her a .

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Expect group projects, readings, models, and .

Format shift

Online and .

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students , and practical software instruction.

Format shift

Positive teaching comments dominate both formats; outliers mainly cite tone or .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

, and iterative design work rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

Assignment-heavy pattern is consistent online and in person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

26 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person studios emphasize one-on-one check-ins, design eye, and high support, though lectures can run long and .

Main concern

Lengthy lectures and delayed .

What students said

“Farida really cares about your progression in the program.”
ID111
“it's difficult to learn .”
STUDIO1
“Farida invests in your success.”
ID132

Remote format

Online

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online sections are well organized with clear syllabi, step-by-step software videos, and and late grades.

Main concern

and rare reports of slow or .

What students said

“Sketchup and Photoshop are taught with step by step videos.”
ID131
“Professor Farida for online ID 110 is amazing! Her and thoughtfully presented.”
ID110
“she takes a month to grade after the because it will kill you on the inside.”
STUDIO1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Courses emphasize projects and rubrics far more than high-stakes proctored exams.

Project BasedClear RubricsSoftware AssignmentsLimited Traditional Exams

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person studios also grade mainly through projects and .

Studio ProjectsOne-on-One Check InsDetailed Feedback
“Farida is a .”
STUDIO1
“ .”
ID132

Online

Online reviews highlight scaffolded software assignments and .

Step-by-Step VideosClear RubricsProject Submissions
“Rubrics & syllabus .”
ID131
“Pretty easy to pass even when Im not the .”
ID110

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you are eager to learn and passionate about design, her classes are a must!”

Voice snapshots generated from 36 reviews, highlighting mentorship, projects, and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Mentorship and Care

88/100

“She is genuinely invested in the success of each of her students and devots all of her time and energy to help them succeed.”

📐

74/100

“She is also very clear in her rubrics what she expects to be turned in for the assignment.”

⏳

42/100

“She takes several weeks to grade so it’s impossible to know where you’re at.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Farida is very informative and passionate about her work!
  • Her presentations are wonderful with lots of real world examples.
  • Lectures were really long and exhausting.

Theme 2

🛠️ About Projects and Skills

  • I learned so much about digital renderings.
  • Get ready for a good amount of work but you will for sure reap the rewards.
  • This class is hands-on with floor plans and a physical 3D model.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • Don't be afraid to ask her for help.
  • .
  • Office hours are plentiful and accessible.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

36

Recent reviews read by the AI

36

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-six recent reviews with rich grade data and consistent themes about feedback and .

Inside 36 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 527
4 out of 54
3 out of 53
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ID1107 reviews
ID1295 reviews
STUDIO15 reviews
ID1274 reviews
ID1314 reviews
Show 5 more courses
ID1113 reviews
ID2163 reviews
ID1322 reviews
ID2102 reviews
ID1261 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

30 reported outcomes

A range

23

A+ 7 · A 16

B range

5

B+ 3 · B 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2