AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Elizabeth Jennison

ACCT1A1B · ACCT1B · ACCT210 · ACCT275 · ACCT1A · ACC1A · ACT1A · ACC1A1B · 56 lifetime ratings

AI rating
66/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
69.64%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you will show up, grind the homework, and can handle a high-energy, sometimes harsh classroom personality.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring but IntenseLots of HomeworkParticipation MattersNotecards on TestsPolarizing Classroom Tone
  • Many students say she builds a strong accounting foundation if you attend, participate, and .
  • A sizable minority report yelling, belittling, or middle-school classroom management that makes class tense.
  • Tests often allow notecards or second attempts, but and Proctorio .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Many As appear and attend, but and dense work mean an A is earned, not free.

In person more often describes notecards, second attempts, and EC; online ethics and some ACC sections feel much harder to wow her.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Accounting builds chapter by chapter and is dense, but her structure can make it learnable rather than impossible.

Online students more often ; in person difficulty tracks participation and cumulative topics.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

every class and skip-class-you-wont-pass messaging.

; online still often requires live participation credit.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

; strong foundation and care outweigh personality complaints for many students.

In-person recommendations are numerous but split; online recommendations rise when lectures feel strong and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Notecards, second attempts, and help, yet tough-grader stories and rare full marks on ethics balance that out.

Format shift

In person often allows notecards and retakes; one online ethics review says full marks are rare because work must wow her.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Pre-class and post-class Connect homework plus group work and .

Format shift

Both formats report lots of homework; online 8-week sections feel especially packed.

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

Most students praise clear systems and genuine care, though a loud minority experiences yelling and disrespect.

Format shift

; online quality swings with lecture usefulness.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and several exams all matter.

Format shift

; in person adds daily quizzes and group presentations.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

41 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and clear, while critics say she yells, embarrasses students, and .

Main concern

and occasional harsh public corrections create stress even when content is strong.

What students said

“if you just do the HW in the order she's set up, you'll remember the material with less effort than you'd expect.”
ACCT1A
“In nearly every class, she yells multiple times and belittles students before explaining mistakes.”
ACC1A
“She also allows a notecard on the test and a second attempt.”
ACCT1A

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

some love her engagement and support, others say lectures are thin so you learn from the textbook site or YouTube.

Main concern

students self-teaching for homework and exams.

What students said

“ as an online course. There is so much material to learn that makes it difficult to learn online.”
ACCT1A
“I regularly had to reference Tony Bell on Youtube to learn the concepts. Her lectures did not prepare me for the work or tests assigned.”
ACCT1A
“she uses Proctorio for the three exams.”
ACC1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are serious but often student-supported with notecards or second attempts; online may use Proctorio.

Notecards AllowedSecond AttemptProctorio OnlineDaily QuizzesGroup Project

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a second attempt, with frequent class quizzes and a group project.

Notecards on TestsSecond AttemptQuiz Every ClassGroup Project
“She also allows a notecard on the test and a second attempt.”
ACCT1A
“SHOW UP TO CLASS. quiz every class.”
ACC1A

Online

Some online sections use Proctorio for three exams; other online ethics .

ProctorioThree ExamsTextbook Website Heavy
“she uses Proctorio for the three exams.”
ACC1A
“ . She stated that she rarely gives out full marks because work needs to "wow" her.”
ACCT210

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you just do the HW in the order she's set up, you'll remember the material with less effort than you'd expect.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting care, workload, and polarizing tone. Credibility rating: High.

🌟 Teaching Quality

74/100

“Professor Jennison was AMAZING! Extremely caring and wanted all her students to pass.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

70/100

“ if you can.”

📚 Heavy Workload

30/100

“LOTS of heavy and . .”

😤 Classroom Tone Risk

40/100

“In nearly every class, she yells multiple times and belittles students before explaining mistakes.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she takes complicated subject matter and really breaks it down into simple concepts
  • Great teacher sometimes
  • Talks down to students disrespectfully

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • An A is easy if you go to class and do the
  • This is not an easy course, no
  • She also allows a notecard on the test and a second attempt

Theme 3

❤️ About Care vs Harshness

  • She's so genuinely passionate about her students
  • It seems like she has tried to embarrass students for being wrong
  • Professor Jennison really cares about her students and wants them to pass the class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

56

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty detailed reviews over many years with a and a consistent minority of harsh-tone complaints yield high confidence.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 531
4 out of 58
3 out of 53
2 out of 56
1 out of 58

Course coverage

ACCT1A25 reviews
ACC1A14 reviews
ACCT1B5 reviews
ACCT2102 reviews
ACC1A1B1 review
Show 3 more courses
ACCT1A1B1 review
ACCT2751 review
ACT1A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

43 reported outcomes

A range

31

A+ 5 · A 21 · A- 5

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

4

C+ 1 · C 2 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1