AI Rate Professor

Theater

Cody Baker

ETT40 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid if and ; the only review calls him the absolute worst.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear directionsConfused gradingCannot explain clearlyLecture heavyStudent ire
  • Only one review, extremely negative on teaching and .
  • Student reports D+ with and unhelpful answers.
  • but participation still mentioned.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

15/100

The only reported grade is D+ with complaints that and unhelpful.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Difficulty rated 4 with lecture-heavy structure and should be.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

75/100

though participation still matters.

Single in-person review; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Student calls him the and .

Only in-person review; but .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

and a D+ outcome signal harsh or opaque evaluation.

Format shift

In-person only; .

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Lecture-heavy with participation and mentioned; volume not described as overwhelming.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

and has earned the class's ire.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Comments focus on .

Format shift

Insufficient detail from .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Single in-person ETT40 , and inability to give straight answers.

Main concern

and explanations that do not clarify questions.

What students said

“ and .”
ETT40
“he cannot give a straight answer to save his life.”
ETT40

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format; .

Unclear directionsConfused grading

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; grading structure and .

Unclear directionsConfused grading structure
“ and .”
ETT40

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ being forced to see on a weekly basis.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review with low sample size. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

10/100

“he cannot give a straight answer to save his life.”

⚖️

15/100

“ and .”

👎 Overall Sentiment

5/100

“He has earned every bit of his class' ire.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • cannot give a straight answer
  • Lecture heavy

Theme 2

📈 About Grades

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Only one recent review with strong negativity; too little sample and no corroboration over time.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ETT401 review

Reported outcomes

D range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values