AI Rate Professor

Architecture

Susan Zimmer

ARCH50 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
93/100
RMP rating
4.9/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

Take Susan Zimmer if you want supportive, clear drafting instruction with student-friendly exams.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaringClear demosOpen-book examsAccessible helpLenient grading
  • All five reviews rate her highly for ARCH/DR drafting courses.
  • , and open-book fair exams.
  • ; .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Students report As and A+s with , and strong help when stuck.

Evidence is mainly in-person; the online review only reports an A+ with praise.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

; difficulty stays moderate rather than brutal.

In-person comments detail easy-to-moderate CAD work; online lacks detail.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

; no single hard rule.

; online listed mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Near-perfect quality ratings and .

Strong across formats; one older in-person would-take-again was no despite a 5 rating.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

80/100

Students explicitly call grading lenient with fair open-book exams and high grades.

Format shift

; online only shows an A+.

Workload

Light

72/100

and clear demos keep load manageable.

Format shift

In-person notes about 3-hour CAD homework; online has no workload detail.

Teaching experience

Excellent

95/100

, and engaging lectures define the praise.

Format shift

Both formats give top quality scores.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Mix of , and open-book exams.

Format shift

; online does not.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person and hybrid-style , and open-book exams.

Main concern

One older note says architecture theory help is limited versus pure drafting.

What students said

“Love prof zimmer! .”
ARCH50
“ , and challenging.”
ARCH50
“anytime you need help she will do the .”
ARCH50

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Single online review calls her one of the .

Main concern

Very little online detail beyond strong overall praise.

What students said

“she is one of , if you going to learn, she is the one”
ARCH50

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are described as open-book, fair, and challenging with supportive drafting practice.

Open-book examsFair but challengingDrafting homework

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

85/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person , and challenging with .

Open-book examsFair examsAutoCAD homework
“ , and challenging. She explains concepts clearly, shares shortcuts, encourages participation, and grades leniently.”
ARCH50

Online

Online review does not describe exam format, only overall teaching praise.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Love prof zimmer! .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting caring teaching and open-book exams. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

95/100

“she is one of , if you going to learn, she is the one”

📘 Student-Friendly Exams

85/100

“ , and challenging.”

❤️ Caring Support

90/100

“anytime you need help she will do the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she goes over very clearly how to do the drawings in her zoom sessions.
  • Teaches with a mix of interactive demos and discussion.
  • she's great

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Homework takes ~3 hrs on AutoCAD
  • grades leniently

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • .
  • easy to reach outside of class
  • Hilarious

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Five consistently positive reviews with useful detail, but small sample and thin online evidence.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ARCH505 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 2 · A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values