AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Natalia Grigoriants

CIMA283A · CIMA283F · CIMA283K · CIMA102B · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
16/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Avoid unless you can self-navigate vague prompts with zero timely support and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough GraderUnresponsive EmailsConfusing InstructionsOutdated MaterialsAvoid For Grading
  • Students say the material is not hard but instructions and .
  • Email non-response and rigid etiquette .
  • crater otherwise working projects.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Content is often called easy, but tough grading, style nitpicks, and .

Online reviews drive the ; in-person notes mainly cite frustration, not easy As.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Multiple students say the class itself is not hard; and support gaps.

Both formats describe easy material with hard logistics.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

no and some yes, and little emphasis on strict enforcement.

Online and and mixed.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

and explicitly recommend other professors due to communication and .

Online reviews are the ; only one older review says yes if you work alone.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students report and grades collapsing after she takes over.

Format shift

Harsh grading is clearest in recent online CIMA102B comments.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Some lots-of-homework tags appear, but the .

Format shift

reviews.

Teaching experience

Awful

20/100

, and ignored emails dominate with almost no praise for teaching.

Format shift

Poor experience is consistent online and in the few in-person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Assessment centers on projects, quizzes, and .

Format shift

Both formats discuss projects and quizzes more than exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Limited in-person comments , and version-mismatch grading pain.

Main concern

Unresponsive instructor and .

What students said

“the ”
CIMA102B
“ to the chapters, the software andor instructions usedgiven were outdated”
CIMA283A

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews focus on non-responsive email, vague assignment text, last-minute postings, and .

Main concern

and .

What students said

“she is a . My grade went from B to a D within 3 days of her taking over”
CIMA102B
“Ask a question does not even answer. vague in itself”
CIMA283A
“when she doesn't post the work that is due until the day before it is due, that is what makes it hard”
CIMA283F

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes with off-topic items more than strict proctored finals; .

Quiz Questions Off ChapterProject HeavyUnclear Exam Challenges

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and software version mismatch more than formal exam rules.

Project GradingOutdated Software Expectations
“I was graded poorly at times since it seemed the professor was using a different(older) version of MS Office”
CIMA283A

Online

Online comments note confusing quiz items not in the chapter and .

Off-Chapter Quiz ItemsProject Focus
“some of the questions on the being covered”
CIMA283A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting non-response, vague work, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

📧 Zero Support

20/100

“She hasn't answered a single one of my emails this entire semester”

📉

18/100

“My grade went from B to a D within 3 days of her taking over”

📄 Vague Instructions

25/100

“the ”

Theme 1

📧 About Communication

  • she never emails back in time; sometimes not at all

Theme 2

📝 About Assignments

  • inconsistent information/directions
  • post the work that is due until the day before it is due

Theme 3

📈 About Grades

  • graded multiple of my fully functioning projects 1/100
  • class is not hard at all

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

Nine reviews with consistent complaints but many older dates and .

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 55

Course coverage

CIMA283A5 reviews
CIMA102B2 reviews
CIMA283F1 review
CIMA283K1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 2 · Not_Sure_Yet 1