AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Glen Stevenson

ARCH51 · AR4CH220 · DR200 · SOLIDWORKS · ARCH220 · DR200DR204 · REVIT1 · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
55.56%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

Good choice for in-person CAD/SolidWorks if you attend every class and practice hands-on; be cautious with accelerated online.

Best fit · Effort For RewardSolidWorks expertHands-on software labsMiss a class fall behindClear when you engageCan be blunt
  • Strong software knowledge in SolidWorks, Revit, and CAD with
  • Show up and ; missing class makes catch-up hard
  • Online or accelerated sections draw harsher reviews for and less helpful tone

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Many report that showing up and , but missed classes and .

In-person evidence supports show-up-and-do-work As; online reviews are harsher and less grade-friendly.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Software learning is hands-on and manageable with practice, but pace and catch-up risk keep it from easy.

In-person difficulty is moderate; online accelerated feels harder.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

and that missing one class makes catching up very hard.

Mainly in-person; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

56/100

About half recommend him for strong software teaching; .

In-person recommendations are stronger; online reviews mostly say no.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Often fair with , but tough on details like title blocks and can feel picky.

Format shift

In-person is mostly fair; .

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Steady hands-on assignments; accelerated online weeks can feel insane.

Format shift

Online summer load is much heavier than typical in-person.

Teaching experience

Good

64/100

Deep software expertise and ; some find him rude or unhelpful when questions lag.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

, and production work with occasional quizzes.

Format shift

Both formats are assignment-driven; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and fair grading if they show up and produce work; some report rudeness or tough grading on details.

Main concern

Missing class is costly, and a minority feel help is uneven or rude.

What students said

“Show up, turn in the . Great class”
SOLIDWORKS
“His sessions are split into a mini lecture and lab time. He will answer the same question many times and not get frustrated.”
DR200
“His class is tough, but how do you expect to learn Solidworks in one semester if it's not.”
SOLIDWORKS

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online and accelerated sections report , and unhelpful answers to questions.

Main concern

Pace and support in online or summer accelerated formats feel overwhelming.

What students said

“The amount of . There was no time to fully learn new concepts and the program as a whole.”
DR200
“ ”
DR200

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mostly hands-on software assignments and .

Assignment-basedHands-on labsOccasional quizzesCSWA preparation

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and some quizzes; CSWA readiness is a noted outcome.

Hands-on labsAssignmentsQuizzes
“if you just do his assignments, you will pass the .”
DR200
“4 quizzes that seems easy BUT he grades them hard.”
ARCH51

Online

Online reviews emphasize heavy weekly homework .

Lots of homeworkWeekly assignment load
“The amount of .”
DR200

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Show up, turn in the . Great class”

Voice snapshots generated from 20 reviews (2 online, 18 in-person) spanning CAD and architecture software courses. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

64/100

“He teaches in a .”

📅

22/100

“Do NOT miss 1 class - hard time catching up.”

💻 Software Expertise

80/100

“Glen knows Solidworks very well.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures were great
  • He will answer the same question many times
  • He is rude and disrespectful towards certain students

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Show up, turn in the
  • His class is tough, but how do you expect to learn Solidworks in one semester if it's not
  • 4 quizzes that seems easy BUT he grades them hard

Theme 3

⏱️

  • Don't miss any classes or you will get behind
  • Skip class? You won't pass.
  • The amount of

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

20

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty reviews across many years and courses with rich detail; polarized but and software expertise.

Inside 20 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 55

Course coverage

DR2007 reviews
ARCH2204 reviews
SOLIDWORKS3 reviews
2202 reviews
AR4CH2201 review
Show 3 more courses
ARCH511 review
DR200DR2041 review
REVIT11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 4

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 1 · B- 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Pass 3