AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Jacqueline Novak

N170 · N176 · N160 · 21 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
71.43%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Take her for clinical if you want a tough but ; for online pharm, only if and quizzes.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring clinical instructorTest-heavy pharmacologySelf-study online formatClear grading criteriaTough but fair careplans
  • Clinical teaching is highly praised as , and career-prep focused.
  • Online N160 is largely self-taught with weekly quizzes, outlines, and limited live teaching.
  • Grades trend high when students study notes and Quizlets, but online support quality is mixed.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Many students earn As by studying outlines, Quizlets, and weekly quizzes, but pharmacology still demands heavy memorization and clinical careplans are graded strictly.

Online evidence emphasizes quiz-driven As ; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is standard nursing pharm and clinical work: heavy memorization and weekly assessments rather than an easy GE pace.

Online reviews stress self-learning difficulty; in-person reviews describe tough but engaging clinical and lecture content.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Online attendance is often optional while clinical and as mandatory.

Online N160 commonly lists non-mandatory attendance; N170/N176 clinical is regularly mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

Strong recommendation for clinical and energetic lectures, tempered .

; online recommendations split between self-learners and students wanting real teaching.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

and high A rates for prepared students, but tags and and quizzes.

Format shift

Online quiz outlines feel fair; as tough for growth.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

, and clinical careplans create a steady, test-heavy load.

Format shift

Online emphasizes weekly quizzes and case studies; in-person clinical adds careplans and mandatory presence.

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

Excellent caring clinical mentoring and real teaching.

Format shift

In-person quality is strong; online quality swings from .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Weekly quizzes, case studies, and a .

Format shift

; clinical adds careplan writing under tough grading.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person clinical and , and tough on careplans in a way that prepares them for later rotations.

Main concern

A minority report two-faced or ; .

What students said

“you are lucky if you can get her as your clinical instructor. .”
N176
“She is a , but it will thoroughly prepare you for upcoming rotations.”
N170
“Super fun and energetic. Lectures are long but interesting, tells you stories of her experiences”
N160

Remote format

Online

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online N160 is quiz- and case-study heavy with outline notes, highlight videos, and limited full lectures; self-motivated students can earn As, others feel abandoned.

Main concern

Minimal teaching, few office hours, and Proctorio quizzes leave some students without real instruction.

What students said

“Maybe she's great in person. But - , outline notes with poor editing & no teaching”
N160
“ anytime during the week, and a case study every other week.”
N160
“Professor Novak was the only professor who ever reached out to me to see if I was okay when I got a bad grade”
N160

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on frequent quizzes and a ; online quizzes may use Proctorio and are not open book.

Weekly quizzesCumulative finalCase studiesProctorio onlineNot open book

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a final with emphasis on lecture highlights; clinical focuses more on careplans than traditional exams.

Weekly quizzesFinal on medsCareplansTest heavy
“1 quiz every week, and the .”
N160
“She is a , but it will thoroughly prepare you”
N170

Online

Online quizzes use Proctorio, run weekly, and are not open book; case studies and a .

ProctorioWeekly quizzesCase studiesCumulative finalNot open book
“ anytime during the week”
N160
“THIS CLASS IS NOT OPEN BOOK.”
N160
“ and a final.”
N160

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Novak is amazing clinical professor. She goes above and beyond for her students.”

Voice snapshots generated from 21 reviews across online and in-person nursing courses, highlighting . Credibility rating: High.

🩺 Clinical Mentorship

88/100

“She goes above and beyond for her students. She is a , but it will thoroughly prepare you for upcoming rotations.”

💻

40/100

“ - , outline notes with poor editing & no teaching”

📝 Test-Heavy Structure

72/100

“14 quizzes, 7 case studies and . Easy class if you have taken Physiology.”

❤️ Caring Outreach

80/100

“Professor Novak was the only professor who ever reached out to me to see if I was okay when I got a bad grade on one of her quizzes”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Super fun and energetic. Lectures are long but interesting
  • She posts her notes in outline form, assigns you case studies and quizzes
  • Lectures are very interesting and engaging

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • pharmacology is hard and a heavy memorization class, but she makes it much easier
  • THIS CLASS IS NOT OPEN BOOK
  • but it's for your benefit

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She is beautiful inside and out and you are lucky if you can get her as your clinical instructor
  • I really love this teacher, she really cares!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

21

Recent reviews read by the AI

21

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

21 detailed reviews across 2017-2023, both formats, with consistent split between strong clinical praise and .

Inside 21 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 513
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 53

Course coverage

N16015 reviews
N1704 reviews
N1762 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

17 reported outcomes

A range

12

A+ 3 · A 9

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2