AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Arshang Ferdosian

MATH10 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you will put in steady weekly hours on an 8-week stats load; .

Best fit · Effort For RewardEXTRA CREDITLots of homeworkMultiple attemptsClear grading criteriaOnline Savvy
  • Both reviews say an A is realistic with and all .
  • 8-week stats is a heavy weekly time commitment.
  • Exams and quizzes match the material; .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

Students say realistic even for weak test takers.

Both the online and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Stats content is moderate; the real challenge is the compressed 8-week pace, not abstract theory alone.

Online and weekly load.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

; in-person review said it was not.

mandatory; in person: .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

95/100

Both reviewers gave 5/5 and , and fair assessment.

Recommendation is unanimous across the one online and one in-person review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

86/100

, multiple attempts on quizzes and tests, and .

Format shift

Both formats emphasize ; in person also notes multiple attempts.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Students warn of a large weekly time commitment for , and in 8 weeks.

Format shift

Online and in-person both call the 8-week stats load hefty.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Described as , and fair about what appears on exams.

Format shift

Both formats rate quality 5; sample size is only two reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Homework and matter a lot alongside quizzes, tests, and a final.

Format shift

and in person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person 8-week stats is responsive with lots of and , and a cheat sheet.

Main concern

Hefty weekly time commitment and proctored tests.

What students said

“Proctored tests and .”
Math10

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online 8-week stats needs heavy lecture and extra-credit time; and an A is achievable with full HW and EC.

Main concern

High weekly time load in a compressed term.

What students said

“A is easily achievable with completing all homework and even if you are a .”
Math10

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams match taught content; proctoring is present but a cheat sheet and multiple attempts soften risk.

Proctored testsCheat sheet allowedMultiple attemptsContent-aligned quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and and multiple attempts.

Proctored testsCheat sheetMultiple attempts
“Proctored tests and .”
Math10

Online

Online review says exams and ; no lock-down software mentioned.

Content-aligned examsExtra credit
“Exam and learn.”
Math10

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“A is easily achievable with completing all homework and even if you are a .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews (1 online, 1 in person), highlighting , workload, and fair exams. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“Professor is responsive and good communicator.”

📗 Easy A With Effort

84/100

“A is easily achievable with completing all homework and even if you are a .”

📚 Workload Reality

32/100

“Stats during an 8-week session is a hefty time commitment each week, just know that going in.”

Theme 1

📈 About Grades &

  • Lots of opportunities and .
  • Lots of via chapter and test reviews.
  • and .

Theme 2

⏱️ About Time Commitment

  • Be prepared to commit a lot of time towards lectures and .
  • Put in the time/effort, do the HW and you'll do well.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only 2 same-day reviews from 2023; detailed and consistent but too few for high confidence.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

Math102 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values