AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Susan Patcha

N173 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

Avoid unless you must take peds clinical and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderCondescending toneHeavy clinical workloadLots of feedbackMandatory attendance
  • Pediatric nursing clinical is extremely hard with and .
  • Two of three students describe condescending, unequal treatment and an unsafe learning feel.
  • One and earned an A, calling peds the hardest section.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

As and A+ are possible but only with , and .

All evidence is from in-person N173 reviews.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

12/100

Every review rates difficulty 5 and calls peds/clinical extremely demanding.

All evidence is from in-person N173 reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

.

All evidence is from in-person N173 reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

; majority cite condescension and painful SIM/skills.

All evidence is from in-person N173 reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Repeated tough grader tags and .

Format shift

In-person only; no online comparison.

Workload

Overwhelming

15/100

Lots of , and .

Format shift

In-person only; no online comparison.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

One student values feedback and access; two describe condescending, unequal clinical teaching.

Format shift

In-person only; no online comparison.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

, and participation dominate over traditional exams.

Format shift

In-person only; no online comparison.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person N173 clinical is brutal, feedback-heavy, and often feels condescending despite some A/A+ grades.

Main concern

Condescending tone, unequal treatment, and overwhelming clinical demands.

What students said

“Very condescending and passive aggressive. Talks like she's speaking to a child 24/7.”
N173
“Gives a ton of feel overwhelming but stay humble and it'll all be OK.”
N173
“Does not provide a safe learning environment. Will speak to you in a condescending tone.”
N173

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on clinical skills, SIM, and .

Clinical skillsSIM labsAssignment rework

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews emphasize clinical homework, SIM/skills performance, and ; .

Clinical skills checksSIM/skillsLots of homework
“Had to correct and .”
N173
“SIM/skills was painful.”
N173
“ .”
N173

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Speaks to her students like children. Doesn't treat her students equally.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews, highlighting clinical difficulty and interpersonal tone. Credibility rating: Medium.

🔥 Course Difficulty

12/100

“looking back I think peds was the hardest.”

⚖️

28/100

“Had to correct and .”

💔 Learning Environment

20/100

“Does not provide a safe learning environment. Will speak to you in a condescending tone.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very condescending and passive aggressive.
  • Gives a ton of
  • Talks like she's speaking to a child 24/7.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • looking back I think peds was the hardest.
  • .
  • Had to correct and .

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Doesn't treat her students equally.
  • Does not provide a safe learning environment.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Three detailed 2022-2023 in-person reviews with consistent difficulty and mixed personality assessments.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

N1733 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values