AI Rate Professor

Human Services

Phillip Falcetti

HS172 · HSHUMA · HS175 · HSC435 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you want practitioner insight and and take-home work despite uneven organization.

Best fit · Self Taught ProReal-World ATOD ExpertiseTake-Home ExamsGroup Project HeavyMixed OrganizationAttendance Flexible
  • Many students praise real-world human services knowledge, guest speakers, and .
  • A , and occasionally absent.
  • ; success depends on doing group work and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Take-home exams straight from the book and if you complete group work.

; the single online review reported an A.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

Material can feel boring or light; difficulty ratings cluster low when students do the required work.

but sometimes boring; online difficulty was moderate.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

85/100

Multiple comments and some students skipped without formal penalty.

; in-person older reviews agree attendance is flexible.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

Strong field expertise and easy assessments win most fans, but disorganization complaints keep it from MustTake.

In-person reviews are split; the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

75/100

and flexible structure favor students who complete the .

Format shift

Most evidence is older in-person; online student earned an A.

Workload

Light

68/100

Main load is a and final rather than constant weekly grind.

Format shift

In-person HS175 details dominate; online mentions group projects and lectures.

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

Praised as knowledgeable and sometimes fun, but criticized by others as disorganized and unclear.

Format shift

In-person opinions split hard; online is mildly positive with contact concerns.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

and .

Format shift

In-person HS175 clearly describes this mix; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Older in-person HS courses mix strong praise for expertise and and missed classes.

Main concern

Organization and clarity can feel weak; .

What students said

“Entire grade was a , and .”
HS175
“One of the . Completely disorganized and .”
HS175
“He is a cornucopia of knowledge and real life ATOD prevention insight.”
HSHUMA

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One asynchronous online HSC435 student enjoyed the class but struggled and relied on the TA.

Main concern

Hard to contact; communication mainly .

What students said

“The only thing I would say is that he is difficult to get ahold of.”
HSC435
“He is not big on emailing and I would have to email the TA instead of him to get a response.”
HSC435

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Multiple in-person reviews describe easy take-home essay exams plus a .

Take-Home MidtermTake-Home FinalEssay Questions From BookGroup Project

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person HS175 used take-home midterms and finals with group project.

Take-Home MidtermTake-Home FinalBook-Based EssaysGroup Project
“Entire grade was a , and .”
HS175
“The midterm and final were 7 essay questions each, straight from the book, very easy.”
HS175

Online

The single online review .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Entire grade was a , and . The midterm and final were 7 essay questions each, straight from the book, very easy.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews (1 online, 9 in-person), highlighting easy take-homes, expertise, and organization split. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Field Expertise

80/100

“He is a cornucopia of knowledge and real life ATOD prevention insight.”

📝 Student-Friendly Exams

82/100

“The midterm and final were 7 essay questions each, straight from the book, very easy.”

⚠️ Organization Concerns

35/100

“ and .”

📬 Online Contact Issues

45/100

“he is difficult to get ahold of. He is not big on emailing”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The material he had was boring but he made it fun!
  • Interesting lectures, guests speakers and great vidoes
  • He works in this field and I have worked with his agency outside of school.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Class can get very boring but its pretty easy to do well
  • Who cares if he takes roll, show up, participate, learn and get an A
  • and doing your work is up to you!

Theme 3

⚠️ About Organization

  • and
  • Bad teacher.
  • On our group project, we literally had no idea what to do until the week before it was due

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

10 reviews exist but most are old and polarized, with only one recent online review, so .

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

HS1757 reviews
HS1721 review
HSC4351 review
HSHUMA1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values