AI Rate Professor

Film

Angelo Ford

CTVR101 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Expect an easy high grade, but check recent sections carefully if you want classic film content rather than AI talk.

Best fit · Easy A HunterAI-Focused LecturesFilm Industry InsightCaring FeedbackPolarizing ContentEasy High Grades
  • some find him inspirational with strong film-industry insight; recent ones say he only talks about AI.
  • Grades are high (A/A+) even when learning satisfaction is low.
  • and engagement style vary by section and year.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

All reported grades are A or A+, including sections where students say they learned little.

High grades appear in both the online and in-person reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Intro film class with mixed intellectual challenge; some call lectures entertaining, others empty.

Difficulty ratings swing widely across recent and older reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

; others say attendance was not required.

Online review marks mandatory; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Half the ; recent AI-focused sections draw strong dislike.

and sub experiences.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

88/100

Students report A and A+ grades and little harsh critique of submissions.

Format shift

High grades span online and in-person sections.

Workload

Light

70/100

Recent comments imply low learning effort; older ones mention lecture-heavy but manageable intro work.

Format shift

Online and recent sub reviews suggest light academic demand.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Teaching quality is polarized between inspirational film lectures and AI-only sessions with little learning.

Format shift

In-person older reviews are strong; recent online and sub reviews are weak.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

40/100

Comments emphasize lectures, submissions, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In person, older reviews call him knowledgeable and inspirational; a recent sub review says he only talked about AI and students learned nothing.

Main concern

and low learning value.

What students said

“all he did was talk about ai. it was so boring and i literally learned nothing the entire semester.”
CTVR101
“Super interesting person and an amazing professor. Wants students to succeed and provides great information and resources.”
CTVR101
“Gives insight into the film industry and its future with really entertaining lectures.”
CTVR101

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

One online CTVR101 review gives quality 1 and says he is weirdly obsessed with AI, despite an A+ grade.

Main concern

Content focus on AI may replace expected film course material.

What students said

“weirdly obsessed with AI.”
CTVR101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a ; assessment talk centers on lectures and student work.

Lecture HeavyParticipation MattersSubmission Feedback

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews focus on lectures and feedback; they do not clearly prove webcam, lockdown, or open-book exams.

Lecture HeavyCaring Feedback
“He hardly speaks negatively of any student submission... You can tell he wants you to succeed.”
CTVR101
“provides great information and resources.”
CTVR101

Online

Online review does .

Participation Matters
“weirdly obsessed with AI.”
CTVR101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“all he did was talk about ai. it was so boring and i literally learned nothing the entire semester. seems like a nice guy though.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews (1 online, 3 in-person), highlighting polarization between AI-focused recent terms and earlier film-industry praise. Credibility rating: Low.

🤖 AI Content Focus

35/100

“weirdly obsessed with AI.”

🎬 Inspirational Film Teaching

85/100

“Gives insight into the film industry and its future with really entertaining lectures.”

🅰️ Easy High Grades

82/100

“He hardly speaks negatively of any student submission... You can tell he wants you to succeed.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Super interesting person and an amazing professor.
  • Very knowledgeable guy... really entertaining lectures.
  • all he did was talk about ai. it was so boring

Theme 2

❤️ About Care and Feedback

  • Wants students to succeed and provides great information and resources.
  • He hardly speaks negatively of any student submission... reassuring.

Theme 3

📈 About Learning Outcomes

  • i literally learned nothing the entire semester.
  • weirdly obsessed with AI.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

40/100

Evidence confidence

Only four reviews with sharp recent-versus-older disagreement reduce confidence in a stable teaching pattern.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CTVR1014 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 2 · A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values