AI Rate Professor

History

Emily Sunderstorm

HIST16 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

Avoid this online Hist16 section unless you accept a huge workload and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderMassive WorkloadSubpar FeedbackMisaligned ReadingsWeekly Essays
  • Assigns heavy weekly short-essay workloads with
  • and
  • Content heavily skewed to narrow themes with

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

15/100

feel nearly unattainable.

Evidence comes only from one Online review.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

12/100

Difficulty is rated max and weekly essay volume plus dense readings keep the course very hard.

Evidence comes only from one Online review.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

88/100

The student .

Evidence comes only from one Online review.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Quality is bottom-tier with and a strongly negative writeup.

Evidence comes only from one Online review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

and accused of as announced.

Format shift

Online-only evidence.

Workload

Overwhelming

10/100

Weekly 1-2 .

Format shift

Online-only evidence.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Students report and lectures poorly matched to assigned readings.

Format shift

Online-only evidence.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Assessment centers .

Format shift

Online-only evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online Hist16 is described as extremely hard work with , and .

Main concern

Workload and and poorly aligned with lectures.

What students said

“she assigns massive workloads based on nothing, she doesn't grade how she ”
Hist16

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“she assigns massive workloads based on nothing, she doesn't grade how she ”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 , and . Credibility rating: Low.

💥 Teaching Quality

15/100

“she gives subpar feedback, she makes the class exclusively about how women and slaves were treated and ”

📚 Workload Overload

10/100

“every week you gotta do 1-2 "short essay" type things”

⚖️

12/100

“she doesn't grade how she says”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • she assigns massive workloads based on nothing
  • she doesn't grade how she says

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Only one 2022 Online review with strong detail but no corroboration across terms or formats.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

Hist161 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values