AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Jacqueline Strobel

CIM1X · CIM1 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
80%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Great pick for , but expect , and mixed organization.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaringAmazing lecturesRespectedLots of homeworkBeginner friendly for older adults
  • Most students praise her as caring, patient, and strong with basic computer skills for older adults.
  • One harsh older review calls the and .
  • Attendance and structure feel stricter online than in person.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

One A was reported, but a negative review cites terrible grading and .

Online evidence is one positive A; and mixed with a .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is basic computers for older adults, yet multiple reviews rate difficulty high and one says teaching made it much harder.

Both formats report difficulty around 4; difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Online and , while other in-person reviews list it as not mandatory.

; most later in-person reviews say no.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Four of and praise her care and lectures, with .

Online is fully positive; older review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

One student got an A and tags are mostly positive, but a detailed negative review calls the .

Format shift

Online reviewer earned an A; complaint.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Tags include Get ready to read and LOTS OF HOMEWORK, and .

Format shift

Online notes reading; .

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Most students call her caring, patient, and excellent with lectures; one and taught straight from the book.

Format shift

Online praise is strong; in-person is mostly excellent with one 1-star disaster review.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Comments emphasize homework, reading, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews mostly praise excellent lectures and care for students, with one and disorganization.

Main concern

, and confusing teaching that made an easy class hard.

What students said

“Jacqueline Strobel is an excellent instructor, gives great lectures, cares about her students and encourages their participation.”
CIM1X
“She . The .”
CIM1

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

One strong online review calls her great and .

Main concern

and the class involves substantial reading.

What students said

“Great class and great professor. .”
CIM1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or proctoring.

Online

Online reviews .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Jacqueline Strobel is an excellent instructor, gives great lectures, cares about her students and encourages their participation.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting care, lectures, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“Jacqueline Strobel is very professional, patient, knows her subject and works well with all of her students.”

❤️ Student Care

85/100

“If you need extra help she will work with you after class to see that you succeed.”

📚 Workload Risk

40/100

“She . The .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • gives great lectures, cares about her students
  • Great instructor! The .
  • She taught straight from the book and half of the time she had no idea what she was talking about.

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • truly cares about every student
  • Caring
  • Respected

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The class should have been easy but the way that she taught it made it very difficult.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

Only five reviews spanning 2017-2022 with mostly consistent praise but one strong negative outlier and limited grade detail.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CIM1X3 reviews
CIM12 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Audit/No Grade 1