AI Rate Professor

English

Jon-Erik Tateri

ENG1A · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

; students describe ENG1A as abysmal and the .

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough graderUnorganizedNo guidanceDoes not teachPoor communication
  • Students report zero teaching value and no response to questions.
  • and sometimes in German.
  • Both online and in-person reviews rate quality at 1 with .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Students earned B or B- yet call him a .

Both online and and mediocre letter grades.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

Difficulty ratings are high and students say the class is hard because he does not teach or give usable guidance.

Online difficulty was 5 and in-person was 4 with the same core complaint.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

Both reviews state attendance was mandatory with no positive upside described.

and in-person comments.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Students and call it the .

In-person student said no to taking again; but was equally negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

and B-range grades with no path to an easy A.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Complaints focus more on zero teaching and bad instructions than volume of assignments.

Format shift

Workload details are sparse in both formats.

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

Students say he does not teach, ignores concerns, and leaves instructions impossible to follow.

Format shift

Quality is 1.0 in both online and in-person reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do .

Format shift

Neither format spells out assessment weights.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person ENG1A was unorganized with , and impossible instructions.

Main concern

Lack of , and usable instructions including German text.

What students said

“This is by far the . This Professor is completely unorganized and cant admit his own faults.”
ENG1A

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online ENG1A felt unsupported with no guidance and materials anyone could find online.

Main concern

Professor ignores questions and concerns and adds no teaching value.

What students said

“This is an abysmal class. Professor Tateri fails to acknowledge questions or concerns, he gives no guidance, and he completely relies on resources anyone could obtain on the internet to teach his class.”
ENG1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

.

Online

Online reviews .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This is by far the . This Professor is completely unorganized and cant admit his own faults.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews (1 online, 1 in person), highlighting teaching failure and harsh experience. Credibility rating: Low.

💀 Teaching Disaster

10/100

“The Professor does not teach, there was a lack of communication and , and all of his instructions are impossible to follow (especially when they are in German!)”

🚫 Zero Recommendation

5/100

“ !!”

📉 No Guidance Online

12/100

“Professor Tateri fails to acknowledge questions or concerns, he gives no guidance, and he completely relies on resources anyone could obtain on the internet to teach his class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he completely relies on resources anyone could obtain on the internet to teach his class
  • The Professor does not teach
  • it takes a specific skill to make a class this bad

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • all of his instructions are impossible to follow
  • B-

Theme 3

💬 About Communication

  • fails to acknowledge questions or concerns
  • lack of communication and
  • cant admit his own faults

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two reviews from 2021-2022, both extremely negative and consistent but too few for high confidence.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENG1A2 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values