AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Theresa Madamba

PSYC30 · PSYCH30 · PSYCH1 · PSYCHOLOGY · PSYC1 · PSYCHINTR · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Take only if you follow instructions exactly and and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing graderClear lecturesExtra creditTough on papersLecture-based tests
  • Older reviews often call intro psych an easy A with .
  • Newer reviews accuse harsh zeros, plagiarism claims, and picky paper rules.
  • Online social psych feedback is mixed but and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Many say study lecture notes and you get an A, but others report zeros and .

; online and newer reviews show more grade risk.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

64/100

Intro psych content is often called easy if you review notes, though papers and .

Both formats describe manageable content when students use her slides and notes.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

68/100

Several say roll stops early or , but going helps because .

In-person comments emphasize optional-after-early-weeks attendance more clearly than online.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

About half would take again; praise for .

Online has both strong yes and strong no; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

, and picky citations pull leniency down despite some easy-quiz reports.

Format shift

and in-person reviews.

Workload

Light

62/100

, and discussion work rather than endless homework.

Format shift

Online adds discussion boards; .

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Enthusiastic clear lecturers alternate with reports of unhelpful, harsh, or panic-prone interactions.

Format shift

In-person quality is highly polarized; online is mixed but includes solid positive experiences.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Quizzes and and essay papers.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

and complaints about harsh grading, rudeness, or boring structure.

Main concern

and tests for some students.

What students said

“EASY A if . really nice teacher, no textbook needed.”
15660
“ .”
PSYC1
“ so !”
PSYCH1

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online social psych can work well with feedback and , but one student got a zero over citation of psych terms.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“She was not too harsh of a follow her instructions specifically and use the psyc terms in discussions.”
PSYC30
“Professor accused me of palargizing a paper because I didn't site any of the Psychology terms learned in class.”
PSYC30
“She gives great feedback, has online hours, great lecture notes online, offers , discussion boards, 3 exams.”
PSYCH30

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; some online tests are timed with short essays, and papers are high-stakes.

Lecture-based testsSection quizzesTimed true/false and short essaysDiscussion boardsExtra credit

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

made of quiz questions, and lecture-based tests.

Section quizzesLecture-based testsFinal from quiz questionsTwo papers
“Expect a week. ... The final was all the quiz questions combined.”
15660
“ so !”
PSYCH1

Online

Online reviews describe 3 exams, discussion boards, and .

3 examsDiscussion boardsTimed testsExtra credit
“discussion boards, 3 exams”
PSYCH30
“Get 60 minutes to answer 30 true/false and 4 short essays for each test.”
PSYC30

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“EASY A if . really nice teacher, no textbook needed.”

Voice snapshots generated from 20 reviews, highlighting polarized grading and lecture-based assessment. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“She is a very enthusiastic teacher. ... She makes sure that people understand a subject, and provides examples .”

⚖️

35/100

“ .”

👍 Recommendation Split

50/100

“ .”

📝 Paper Strictness

40/100

“Gave me 0 zero on the though I didn't use outside sources like the assignment said.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Puts all the lectures on Blackboard
  • Very helpful and kind teacher
  • the class wasn't engaging at all

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • EASY A if
  • she is a
  • if you study

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • I actually believe she likes to see students struggle and fail
  • really nice teacher

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

20

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

20 reviews from 2011-2022 with rich detail but polarized opinions lower perfect consistency.

Inside 20 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 54

Course coverage

PSYCH17 reviews
PSYC16 reviews
PSYC302 reviews
106651 review
156601 review
Show 3 more courses
PSYCH301 review
PSYCHINTR1 review
PSYCHOLOGY1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A- 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values