AI Rate Professor

Human Services

Kim Branch-Stewart

HS177 · HS102 · HS131 · HS285 · HUMANSERVICES · HS174 · HSALL · HS140 · HS112 · HS105 · HS110 · HS100 · HS104 · 27 lifetime ratings

AI rating
76/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if you want an inspiring human-services mentor and are ready for participation and high standards.

Best fit · Effort For RewardInspirational mentorCaring and practicalForced participationPhone policy strictTough on rewrites
  • knowledge
  • Many students earn A if they participate and follow the syllabus closely
  • Polarizing on organization, forced icebreakers, and

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Many students earn A by showing up and following instructions, but and rewrites block free easy A's.

In person has more A outcomes; online still often yields A but with more frustration.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

, yet reading, presentations, and participation keep it from feeling trivial.

Online accelerated sections feel heavier; in .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Attendance and participation are repeatedly described as required and central to the grade.

classroom participation pressure in person.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

Most students strongly recommend her for growth and mentorship, but a .

In-person recommendations are warmer; online recommendations are more mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Many call her fair and supportive, while others report tough rewrites and .

Format shift

Online comments flag inconsistent grading more often than in person.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Expect , and participation rather than light busywork.

Format shift

Online accelerated sections feel reading-heavy; in person adds presentations and group work.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Majority praise her passion, field experience, and care, with minority complaints about digressions and forced activities.

Format shift

Teaching praise is strongest in person; online organization draws more criticism.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Mix of , and midterm or final assessments depending on course.

Format shift

Online leans assignments and reading; in person mixes participation, projects, and exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

24 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person she is often called inspirational and caring, though a minority cite harsh phone rules and forced participation.

Main concern

Mandatory participation and .

What students said

“Kim is a beacon of hope in a dark, dark world.”
HS100
“Treating each and every student with, "UNCONDITIONAL POSITIVE REGARD" made some of the most challenging courses feel like a long talk with a friend.”
HS110
“If you wanna be a if !”
HS100

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

some love and less inspiring online.

Main concern

Organization and online discussion quality can frustrate students.

What students said

“Took several classes with Kim. Loved all of them. Sometimes she can be strict but she wants you to learn it right.”
HS100
“This class is not meant to be online. Thanks COVID!”
HS100
“lacks organization, can't stay on topic... ”
HS105

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam formats vary by course; some report easy quizzes or .

Easy exams for someTake-home midtermIn-class finalOnline exams mentionedParticipation-heavy grade

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person courses mix easy quizzes or exams with presentations and heavy participation; and in-class final.

Take-home midtermIn-class finalEasy quizzesGroup projectsParticipation required
“ and a in class final.”
HS102
“ and final, and 5 easy homework assignments.”
HS285
“ .”
HS100

Online

Online reviews emphasize weekly reading and assignments more than proctored exams; one notes imperfect test items.

Weekly assignmentsDiscussion questionsTests with mistakes noted
“All I did was read and .”
HS100
“makes and webpage”
HS105

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Kim is a beacon of hope in a dark, dark world. She expects a lot of her students, but she is an incredible person and phenomenal lecturer.”

Voice snapshots generated from 27 reviews, highlighting mentorship, standards, and participation. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“She is fair, she is competent, and she is an amazing teacher.”

❤️ Mentorship & Care

85/100

“You are my mentor, in & out of the classrooms of my life.”

⚖️ Tough Standards

45/100

“you could work and she will give you 10/20.”

🚪 Forced Participation

30/100

“Kim disallowed me to opt out of a class icebreaker game.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • phenomenal lecturer
  • She has a wealth of practical knowledge that extends well beyond the textbook
  • Its full of lectures which lead totally off track.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • As long as , and come to class, you will get an A.
  • When you ask to clarify she gets mad but explains and makes you have to rewrite everything.
  • and the class is understandable if you pay attention

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • ever have.
  • I. Love. Kim. Branch. Stewart.
  • Don't bring any electronics in class!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

27

Recent reviews read by the AI

27

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-seven reviews over many years with consistent themes of care, participation demands, and .

Inside 27 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 517
4 out of 54
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

HS1009 reviews
HS2854 reviews
HS1103 reviews
HS1402 reviews
HS1021 review
Show 8 more courses
HS1041 review
HS1051 review
HS1121 review
HS1311 review
HS1741 review
HS1771 review
HSALL1 review
HUMANSERVICES1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

20 reported outcomes

A range

17

A+ 1 · A 16

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2