AI Rate Professor

Social Science

Sherry Miller White

SOCIOLOGY101 · SOCPROB · SOC101 · SOC1 · SOC100 · SOC2 · SOCBGS · SOCONE · INTROSOC · INTROTOSOC · SOCIOLOGY1 · 256 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
20%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

unless you have no other option and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProHighly disorganizedConfusing lecturesTough graderUnresponsive to emailChaotic classroom rules
  • Widespread reports of disorganization, confusion, and unprepared lectures
  • Many students fail or struggle on poorly worded tests despite some easy-A reports with
  • and in person from non-response and harsh classroom management

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

A few students get As via or skipping lectures, but and failing grades.

Both formats report grading confusion; , while some online work is called simple but graded unpredictably.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Material can be basic, but , and chaos make the course feel hard.

Online students sometimes call the work simple; in-person students more often call lectures and .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

42/100

while and students leave mid-class.

In-person policies vary widely; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Overwhelming majority , and lack of teaching.

and in-person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

28/100

Frequent tough-grader reports, confusing rubrics, and lost or .

Format shift

; in-person reviews stress tough and .

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Workload itself is not always heavy, but and last-minute posts create stress.

Format shift

Online focuses on discussions and delayed grading; , and .

Teaching experience

Awful

16/100

Students repeatedly call her unprepared, confusing, disorganized, and among the .

Format shift

Negative teaching quality is consistent across online and in-person formats.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Tests and about exam wording and lost tests.

Format shift

; online emphasizes discussion boards and written assignments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

44 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews describe chaotic lectures, confusing exams, harsh or childish rules, and .

Main concern

and tough, unclear tests create high fail risk despite occasional .

What students said

“TERRIBLE professor. and is off topic 90% of the time!!”
SOC1
“She is the worst teacher ever. .”
SOC1
“I would rather kill myself than go to this class.”
SOCIOLOGY1

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students report slow or , and unfair discussion scores.

Main concern

No email response and .

What students said

“Even online, this professor will not respond to any emails, shows little to no helpfulness towards students, and is an unclear and .”
SOCIOLOGY1
“If you want your assignments . It takes forever for things to be graded.”
SOC1
“The class itself is pretty easy but the professor is not prompt in responding to emails. ”
SOC1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are often described as , and poorly aligned with lectures, with study guides posted late if at all.

Tough testsConfusing question wordingLast-minute study guidesExtra credit sometimes available

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and sometimes posted without timely study guides.

Tough testsConfusing wordingLast-minute study guides
“does not post study guides until the night before the test!”
SOC1
“the so confused”
SOC1

Online

Online reviews do not clearly detail proctoring, but and and slow.

Unclear gradingSlow feedback
“I did everything her rubric asked for with the discussion boards, and went beyond. She never gave me more than a 710.”
SOC1
“she .”
SOCIOLOGY101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you want !”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (6 online, 44 in , and grading chaos. Credibility rating: High.

💥 Teaching Disaster

16/100

“She is the worst teacher ever. .”

🚫

18/100

“ . One of the .”

📉

28/100

“ but still you'll never understand why you have too low or too high grades.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Doesn't make any sense when teaching
  • Never knows what she is doing in class

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • everyone fails the tests because
  • easy A though

Theme 3

📧 About Communication & Rules

  • treats the class like we're all back in elementary school
  • Told a student last class he needed to ask permission to use the restroom

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

256

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews spanning many years with highly consistent negative themes across online and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 525
4 out of 513
3 out of 520
2 out of 541
1 out of 5157

Course coverage

SOC132 reviews
SOCIOLOGY14 reviews
SOC23 reviews
INTROSOC2 reviews
SOC1012 reviews
Show 6 more courses
SOCBGS2 reviews
INTROTOSOC1 review
SOC1001 review
SOCIOLOGY1011 review
SOCONE1 review
SOCPROB1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 3 · A- 2

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 2 · Not_Sure_Yet 1