AI Rate Professor

Art

Kathryn Stovall Dennis

ART11 · ART10 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
92/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you want an inspiring mentor who is tough but fair and will push your work.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerInspirational ArtistFair CritiquesCaring MentorHilariousTough But Fair
  • Students praise her as an exceptional, imaginative ceramics artist and mentor.
  • Critiques are described as fair and practical, pushing real skill growth.
  • , but nearly everyone ends up recommending her.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

66/100

Students earn high grades but describe fair critiques and real improvement expectations rather than free As.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

creative risk-taking and skill growth matter more than textbook grind.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

as .

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

93/100

Students say she inspires creative risk, gives practical critiques, and they look forward to taking her again.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Described as tough but fair with practical critiques; reported grades are strong A-range and Pass.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Studio practice and improvement work are expected; comments emphasize growth more than light busywork.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Students highlight inspirational teaching, amazing creative imagination, clear improvement guidance, and care.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and improvement rather than formal exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, and tough but fair, with strong critiques and lasting creative impact.

Main concern

and attendance is usually required.

What students said

“ and try things that I would not have considered before taking her class.”
ART11
“You couldn't ask for a better instructor.”
ART11
“Tough but fair. Loved her class.”
ART11

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on fair critiques and .

Studio CritiquesProject-Based Work

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and critique based; reviews do not describe traditional exam proctoring.

Studio CritiquesProject-Based Work
“gives fair critiques of work and practical instructions on how to improve.”
ART11
“Tough but fair. Loved her class.”
ART11

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You couldn't ask for a better instructor.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews, highlighting inspiration, fair critiques, and strong recommendation. Credibility rating: Medium.

✨ Inspiration

92/100

“ and try things that I would not have considered before taking her class.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“I've learned more in this class than in any other class for ceramics.”

⚖️

62/100

“Tough but fair. Loved her class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She has an endless creative imagination and her work is awe inspiring.
  • gives fair critiques of work and practical instructions on how to improve.
  • Friendly, educated and educating.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Tough but fair.
  • She cares about her students and is interested in helping you improve.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Exceptional artist!
  • I'm taking another class with her next semester and I'm looking forward to it.
  • Loved her class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Four in-person reviews from 2014-2021 are consistently positive and detailed enough, but the sample is small and older.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ART113 reviews
ART101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Pass 1