AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Ricardo Fernandez

ANTH1 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Skip if and clean tests; only consider if .

Best fit · Self Taught ProPoor lecture qualityTest heavyMisleading quizzesMixed fairnessLow recommendation
  • Overall quality is low with only .
  • Tests and answers and minute-detail memorization.
  • One student found him fair and caring, but most criticized relevance and delivery.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

Grades land in B to C- range with test-heavy, detail-heavy assessment and little easy-A language.

Online shows mixed fairness; .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Average difficulty is high and comments , and .

Online and in-person both describe challenging assessment; .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

while the in-person review marks it mandatory.

; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Only one of three students would take him again and .

One online yes versus one online no and one in-person no.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

42/100

One student says effort equals grade, but others report error-filled tests and few graded items.

Format shift

Online fairness praise conflicts with online and .

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Weekly discussion boards plus quizzes and .

Format shift

In-person highlights weekly DBs and quizzes; online stresses test prep.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Poor webcam lectures, rambling, and .

Format shift

Online criticizes lecture quality; in-person criticizes content relevance.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

and high-stakes memorization-based tests.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person student felt assignments drifted into identity politics and .

Main concern

Assignments and .

What students said

“Lacks the ability to connect the studies of Anthropology with assignments and quizzes.”
ANTH1

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

one calls him fair and and error-filled tests requiring memorization of documentaries.

Main concern

Poor lecture audio/video and .

What students said

“Fernandez is a fair and honest Professor. If you have questions or concerns about an .”
ANTH1
“His tests are littered with wrong answers, and .”
ANTH1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes are high-stakes, detail-heavy, and sometimes inaccurate, making them student-unfriendly.

Test heavyMisleading quizzesMinute detail memorizationError-filled tests

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as misleading and weekly chapter quizzes may not align with anthropology content.

Test heavyMisleading quizzesWeekly quizzes
“ .”
ANTH1

Online

and require memorizing minute details from long documentaries.

Error-filled testsDocumentary detail memorizationPoor lecture prep
“The long documentaries”
ANTH1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“His tests are littered with wrong answers, and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews (2 online, 1 in and mixed fairness. Credibility rating: Medium.

📚 Teaching Quality

30/100

“Really poor lectures, they're made with a terrible webcam, you can't hear what he is saying half the time.”

🧪

32/100

“The long documentaries”

⚖️ Fairness Split

42/100

“Your grade is based on how much work you put into the class; it's fair game.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Really poor lectures
  • terrible webcam
  • fair and honest Professor

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Test heavy

Theme 3

📝 About Assignments

  • every week the Professor has a DB assignment
  • Nothing to do with Anthro

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Three recent reviews with mixed tones give useful signal but a small sample and some conflicting fairness views keep credibility medium.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ANTH13 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B 1 · B- 1

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values