AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Kira Kuznetsov

MATH235 · MATH253 · MATH10 · MATH351 · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
33/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
31.25%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Avoid if ; only take her if you can self-teach stats and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTest HeavyLots of HomeworkFlipped ClassroomTough GraderMixed Math Stats
  • Many students say lectures or and tests.
  • Tests are often hard while ; a , and care.
  • Would-take-again is low, especially in recent MATH10 feedback.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

As are possible with , but and picky grading make the A costly.

Online ; in-person reports range from A+ with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Students call concepts overcomplicated and simpler.

Almost all difficulty evidence is In person MATH10; the single Online review also rates high difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

72/100

as not mandatory, though skipping can still leave you behind.

; Online also listed attendance as no.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

and many recent reviews say do not get her despite some strong fans.

In person is mixed by year and course; Online sample is purely negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

38/100

and point-docking complaints outweigh occasional grade rounding stories.

Format shift

In person has both harsh and ; Online calls her unfair.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Lots of , and a final drive a heavy load.

Format shift

Heavy workload appears across Online and In person MATH10.

Teaching experience

Average

42/100

Some find her witty, caring, and clear; many find flipped lectures unhelpful and misaligned.

Format shift

Older In person higher-level courses are more positive than recent MATH10.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Test-heavy design with multiple tests and a .

Format shift

In ; Online also flags quizzes and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person MATH10 often uses flipped lectures, heavy Excel or , and a semester project, with some older higher-math praise for care and clarity.

Main concern

Tests and , and .

What students said

“Her lecture videos have nothing to do with the hw or the tests and quizzes.”
MATH10
“ , so make sure you study extra hard.”
MATH10
“ . Knows and loves what is doing.”
MATH253

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One strongly negative Online MATH10 review calls her unhelpful, rude, and mismatched between lectures and assessments.

Main concern

with combative answers to questions.

What students said

“ . She's incredibly unhelpful, RUDE, and unfair.”
MATH10

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are generally hard and central, with limited student-friendly features mentioned in some terms.

Test HeavySome Take-Home TestOpen Note Final MentionedQuizzesSemester Project

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person comments , and an open-note or open-laptop final in at least one term.

Hard TestsTake-Home TestOpen Note FinalWeekly Quizzes
“4 tests, 1 is a .”
MATH10
“Final is worth more than 2 tests and is open note/laptop.”
MATH10

Online

Single Online review does not clearly prove proctoring or open-book policy; focus is on and .

Quizzes MentionedTough Grading
“ and have nothing to do with the HW & quizzes.”
MATH10

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !!!!!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 reviews, , and mixed care. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Alignment

35/100

“Her lecture videos have nothing to do with the hw or the tests and quizzes.”

📝 Workload & Tests

30/100

“ , so make sure you study extra hard.”

❤️ Positive Fan Voice

85/100

“ . Knows and loves what is doing.”

👍 Recommendation Level

32/100

“ if possible!!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • flipped classroom
  • witty sense of humor

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Test heavy

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • Lots of homework
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

76/100

Evidence confidence

19 reviews over many years with consistent MATH10 themes of and flipped instruction support medium-high reliability.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 57

Course coverage

MATH1014 reviews
MATH2532 reviews
101901 review
MATH2351 review
MATH3511 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 4

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 1 · B- 1

C range

3

C 2 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1