AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Preetha Anand

CHEMESTRY3 · 1B · CHEM03 · CHEM3 · CHEM1B · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
46/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
58.82%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you already have chem background and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing Chem ProfessorLots of HomeworkTough Grader ReportsCaring When It ClicksLecture Heavy
  • Reviews split hard between caring easy-A CHEM3 fans and students who call her unprepared and unfair.
  • Homework, labs, and weight.
  • The single online review is strongly negative on organization and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

54/100

Some students report an easy A with homework and practice tests, while and .

Online evidence is strongly negative; and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Intro chem content is manageable for prepared students but rough for true beginners under heavy lecture and .

Online review rates difficulty very high; in-person reviews span easy CHEM3 to hard CHEM1B.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

and tag skip-class-you-wont-pass.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

56/100

; praise for care clashes with .

Online review is a hard no; in-person opinions split by course and semester.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

and complaints about unfair point threats outweigh the easy-A success stories.

Format shift

Online review is harsh; several in-person CHEM1B reviews also call grading unfair.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Lots of , and lecture-heavy days dominate student tags and comments.

Format shift

Online and .

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Caring, helpful lectures for some students; .

Format shift

In-person CHEM3 skews warmer; online and some summer CHEM1B sections skew cold.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

alongside labs, homework, and participation.

Format shift

In-person comments detail 60 percent tests; online review focuses on participation and ungraded labs.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person CHEM3 and CHEM1B sections range from welcoming easy As with and .

Main concern

, and several students report harsh grading.

What students said

“She is extremely welcoming and friendly and really encourages asking questions”
CHEM3
“ ”
CHEM1B
“overall it was a good class and easy A”
CHEM3

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The lone online CHEM3 review , and harsh tech-driven participation rules.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“Half way through the semester not a ”
CHEM3

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are high-stakes and sometimes described as poorly aligned with lectures, with little proctoring detail given.

Heavy Final WeightPractice Tests SometimesFinals Can Mismatch Lecture

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and some finals that feel unlike taught material, with practice tests in better terms.

Test HeavyPractice TestsFinal Mismatch Reports
“There is no way anyone could have ever prepared for ”
CHEM1B
“ and ample time for ”
CHEM3
“ so different from what we learned”
CHEMESTRY3

Online

Online review ; it stresses ungraded labs and participation scored during learning videos.

Participation During VideosLabs Graded Late
“ if the correct answer is selected during lecture videos”
CHEM3

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If I could give her 0/5, I would. Never have I encountered the most disrespectful teacher in my college going years.”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 reviews (1 online, 16 in person), highlighting polarization in grading and care. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚖️

34/100

“She threatens to take more points away from you, grades very unfairly”

❤️ Caring Side

75/100

“really compassionate and wants to see her students succeed”

📚

32/100

“ ”

👍 Split Recommendations

56/100

“Take this class!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • extremely welcoming and friendly and really encourages asking questions
  • Never prepared for the class
  • A little hard to understand at first but overall a good teacher

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • overall it was a good class and easy A
  • so different from what we learned
  • Tests are 60% of the grade

Theme 3

💻 About Online Format

  • and not tech-savvy AT ALL
  • Half way through the semester not a

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Seventeen reviews give a usable sample, but strong polarization and only one online review reduce certainty.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 56

Course coverage

CHEM39 reviews
CHEM1B3 reviews
1B2 reviews
CHEMESTRY32 reviews
CHEM031 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 4 · A 6

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values