AI Rate Professor

Architecture

Adrian Erb

ARCH50 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid unless you can fully self-teach CAD/drafting with zero instructor support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnresponsiveNo support materialsCOVID chaosNot CAD focusedSkip and fail risk
  • Only one review exists, and the student dropped.
  • Student expected CAD help but got mechanical drafting focus with .
  • and COVID made the second quarter worse.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

The only student withdrew and reported no help or materials, so an easy A is unsupported.

All .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Student found the combo arch/ME drafting setup hard and mismatched to learning CAD.

Difficulty comes only from the single in-person review.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

as .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

and a drop.

Recommendation is based .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

40/100

; the student dropped before a .

Format shift

; .

Workload

Moderate

40/100

Group projects and , but workload volume is under-described.

Format shift

Workload cues are only from the one in-person review.

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

Student reports , and no materials during the COVID quarter.

Format shift

Teaching judgment rests on a single in-person complaint.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Review mentions group projects but not a .

Format shift

Assessment details are sparse and in-person only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Single in-person ARCH50 review describes poor support, wrong skill focus, and a .

Main concern

and no reference materials when instruction was needed most.

What students said

“She never helped/replied to emails and there was no material to reference”
ARCH50

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She never helped/replied to emails and there was no material to reference.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review with no online reviews. Credibility rating: Low.

📉 Support & Responsiveness

15/100

“She never helped/replied to emails and there was no material to reference”

👎 Recommendation

12/100

“No”

🎯 Course Fit

30/100

“I took ARCH 50 to learn CAD but I ended up in a combo arch and mechanical engineering class”

Theme 1

📧 About Communication

  • She never helped/replied to emails
  • there was no material to reference

Theme 2

📐 About Course Content

  • I took ARCH 50 to learn CAD but I ended up in a combo arch and mechanical engineering class
  • only knows mechanical engineering/drafting

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

18/100

Evidence confidence

Only one 2020 review with a ; too little sample and no corroboration.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ARCH501 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1