AI Rate Professor

History

Ricardo Crespo

PS17 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
36/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Decent if you want a , but skip if you need sharp critical analysis or a sure recommendation.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaringTough GraderFew Graded ItemsKnowledgeableSoft on Critique
  • Students find him knowledgeable, nice, and discussion-friendly
  • Graded on few items and tagged as a
  • Would-not-take-again feedback cites weak critical framing on imperialism

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Student earned an A and few items are graded, but .

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Standard

40/100

Difficulty is rated high and .

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

The as mandatory.

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

and knowledgeable, the .

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

42/100

and graded by few things; one student still earned an A.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

68/100

Graded by few things suggests a .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Knowledgeable and fun discussions, but students want more critical analysis.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Few graded items with discussion focus; .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person PS17 is discussion-based with a caring instructor but limited critical edge.

Main concern

Soft handling of imperialism and limited critical thinking may frustrate stronger students.

What students said

“very knowledgeable and and interesting. but afraid to let his opinions be known, and therefore not a lot of critical thinking, and way too soft on the role of imperialism in Latin America”
PS17

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews ; assessment appears sparse and discussion-centered.

Few Graded Items

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; as based on few things.

Few Graded Items
“ ”
PS17

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“very knowledgeable and and interesting. but afraid to let his opinions be known, and therefore not a lot of critical thinking”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review, highlighting caring style and critical-thinking concerns. Credibility rating: Low.

❤️ About Character

70/100

“very knowledgeable and and interesting.”

🧠 Critical Thinking Gap

30/100

“not a lot of critical thinking, and way too soft on the role of imperialism in Latin America”

⚖️

42/100

“ ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • very knowledgeable and nice
  • and interesting
  • not a lot of critical thinking

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Graded by few things
  • A

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Single 2019 review limits consistency checks despite detailed commentary.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PS171 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values