AI Rate Professor

English

L. Pangborn

READING · ENG1A · ENGLISH180 · ENGLISH1A · ENG180 · EN300 · ENG1B · ENGLISH · ENG340 · ENGLENG1 · 48 lifetime ratings

AI rating
29/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
28.57%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Avoid unless you thrive with strict structure and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerRamble-Heavy LecturesTough Subjective GraderMandatory AttendanceUnclear ExpectationsPolarizing Personality
  • Many students call lectures rambling, off-topic, and unhelpful for essays.
  • as harsh, subjective, and .
  • A minority improve as writers if , and revise.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

and few safety nets mean an A requires heavy effort and alignment with her style.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

College English and reading loads are substantial, with weekly papers and heavy reading rather than simple busywork alone.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

Tags and and you will not pass.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Low take-again rate and growth stories.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

24/100

Students report tough, subjective essay marks and .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Frequent essays, reading, notebooks, and .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

Common , and weak classroom support.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Papers, notebooks, and most comments.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

48 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person ENG1A and reading courses with , and frequent complaints about rambling and .

Main concern

Unclear rubrics, favoritism, and discouraging .

What students said

“Overall, she's a horrible teacher and . ”
ENG1A
“ for help and she would tell you one thing and then get mad at you for following her instructions”
ENG1A
“You weren't easy but you were extremely fair.”
ENG1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on essays and occasional tests; reviews do .

Essay-focused assessmentVocabulary testsFew graded items

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and ; some vocabulary tests mentioned; proctoring tools not clearly described.

Essay revisions sometimes allowedVocabulary testsLecture-based class
“she will give you papers to write with no context on what to include or even write about.”
ENG1A
“be willing to study hard for .”
ENG180
“when given a chance to edit your paper after turning it in, that will help too.”
ENG1A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Overall, she's a horrible teacher and . ”

Voice snapshots generated from 48 in-person , and minority positives. Credibility rating: High.

🗣️ Lecture Rambling

30/100

“She rambles on and on about things nobody cares about.”

⚖️

24/100

“ in the syllabus but the so subjective”

🚫 Low Recommendation

28/100

“ ”

✏️ Growth for Some

60/100

“I definitely became a better and guidance.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Not a teacher, she is more like a lecturer.
  • She tends to ramble on and her lectures are longer than they need to be.
  • She's great, some people dont get her but if you

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Saying that she is a .
  • 800-1000 word essay due every week
  • She does grade hard,but she gives you a second try by revising the essay

Theme 3

😤 About Classroom Climate

  • she also would make fun of the students who got bad grades in front of the whole class
  • Definitely played favorites
  • She was rude and discouraging to some of her students.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

48

Recent reviews read by the AI

48

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Forty-eight reviews over many years consistently , and low recommendation.

Inside 48 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 57
3 out of 54
2 out of 513
1 out of 515

Course coverage

ENG18018 reviews
ENG1A18 reviews
ENG3403 reviews
ENGLISH1A2 reviews
READING2 reviews
Show 5 more courses
EN3001 review
ENG1B1 review
ENGLENG11 review
ENGLISH1 review
ENGLISH1801 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 2 · A- 1

B range

4

B 4

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2