AI Rate Professor

Political Science

Kendralyn Webber

PS1 · POLYSCI · POLI1 · PS11 · POLISCI · PS4 · ECON11 · 39 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
65.22%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Prefer her in person if you want engaging politics lectures and will do the papers and study guides; .

Best fit · Effort For RewardHilariousCaringLecture heavyExtra creditPolitical bias debates
  • In-person students often praise energetic, funny lectures and a .
  • , tests, and participation driving the grade.
  • Online experience is much weaker, with self-teaching complaints and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

guides, rewrites, and participation, though some call her a .

two negative online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

Content is generally manageable intro political science or econ with readings and .

Online reviews describe more self-teaching difficulty than typical in-person reports.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Some sections list attendance mandatory and participation-based, while .

Mixed signals appear across in-person reviews; .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

About two-thirds would take again, with strong in-person fans and a .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

, but tough-grader tags and inconsistent marks appear.

Format shift

Online students emphasize slow or .

Workload

Moderate

52/100

and final, debates or group projects.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

Passionate, funny, caring lectures dominate, offset by bias, disorganization, and .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Grades mix papers or , and participation.

Format shift

; online focuses more on self-directed writing.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

37 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person she is often called engaging, funny, and , and many A grades, plus recurring bias and .

Main concern

Some students dislike political bias, slow grading, dry lectures, or .

What students said

“Easy A class. ”
PS1
“ guides.”
PS1
“Lectures were completely irrelevant to the ”
ECON11

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Both online reviews are strongly negative, describing confusing writing-heavy work with little help or lecture support.

Main concern

Students report teaching yourself from a , and little instructor help.

What students said

“terrible professor.”
PS1
“You have to teach yourself everything.”
PS1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are usually standard midterm and , with papers also counting heavily.

Study-guide-based testsMultiple choice midterm and finalReading responsesIn-class case or partner final

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and finals often follow study guides or lectures, with multiple choice and .

Study-guide-based testsMultiple choice midterm and finalRewrite reading responses
“ guides.”
PS1
“ and ”
PS1

Online

Online reviews do not clearly describe proctoring or open-book policy; and little lecture help.

Writing-heavySelf-taught from book
“There are a lot of writing assignments, and the ”
PS1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She really cares about her students as well.”

Voice snapshots generated from 39 reviews (2 online, 37 in person), highlighting teaching, grades, and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

74/100

“The lectures were insightful and engaging.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

68/100

“ !!!”

⚖️

58/100

“People thought she was a , but I felt she was easy.”

💻 Online Experience

20/100

“I thought her online class was terrible.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • energetic and funny
  • passionate about the subject

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A class
  • fill out study guides

Theme 3

⚠️ Common Critiques

  • inputs her own political views way too much
  • takes her FOREVER to grade
  • You have to teach yourself everything

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

39

Recent reviews read by the AI

39

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

39 reviews with rich detail, grade data, and consistent themes across years, plus a .

Inside 39 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 524
4 out of 57
3 out of 51
2 out of 55
1 out of 52

Course coverage

PS129 reviews
PS114 reviews
ECON112 reviews
POLI11 review
POLISCI1 review
Show 2 more courses
POLYSCI1 review
PS 41 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

28 reported outcomes

A range

21

A+ 9 · A 11 · A- 1

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

3

C 3

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1