AI Rate Professor

Social Sciences

Carolyn Dibrell

ECON4 · MICROECON · ECON2 · MICROECONOMICS · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
60%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

Solid pick for an if you attend and do the quizzes, but not ideal if you want deep unbiased theory.

Best fit · Effort For RewardLaid-back quizzesOwn textbookParticipation and projectsEasy A if you show up
  • Most students find the class fairly easy with quizzes, projects, and a final
  • She uses her own book and rewards participation and
  • many call her great and hilarious, others say opinionated or unhelpful

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Many report easy A , and projects if you attend and stay on time.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

Most call content fairly easy; a .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Some say go to class for explanations and ; .

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

About 60% take-again vibe with many high fives and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

75/100

, and , though presentations can be graded hard.

Format shift

In-person only.

Workload

Light

72/100

Typically four quizzes and ; not much busy work if you pay attention.

Format shift

In-person only.

Teaching experience

Good

68/100

Many praise enthusiasm and clarity; others say she is hard to understand, biased, or unaccommodating.

Format shift

In-person only.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Grade mix of , and a final tied to quiz material.

Format shift

In-person only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person econ students mostly report an easy, laid-back class with quizzes and projects; a minority criticize bias, strict deadlines, or weak content mastery.

Main concern

Participation and presentations matter, and a few found her strict on late work or too opinionated.

What students said

“If you want an . If you .”
ECON2
“If you do 2/3 of the and do fine on the .”
ECON4
“it's incredibly difficult to fail unless you just don't attend.”
MICROECONOMICS

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on several quizzes plus a final and .

Quizzes count heavilyFinal based on quizzesExtra credit activitiesParticipation projects

Assessment risk

Standard

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a final based on quizzes.

4 quizzesFinal based on quizzesOptional point assignments
“Four quizzes and a .”
ECON4
“8 quizzes she takes best 4 as your ones that count.”
ECON4
“The easy.”
ECON4

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you want an . If you .”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 in-person reviews, balancing easy-grade praise with content and strictness critiques. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

68/100

“Extremely enthusiastic about teaching and being in her class can actually turn out to be fun!”

📈 Easy Grade Path

82/100

“If you do 2/3 of the and do fine on the .”

⚖️ Content Concerns

40/100

“For Economics, she is way too opinionated.”

👍 Recommendation

68/100

“ and at ease with the environment of the college.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • teaches straight & to the point
  • Very hard to understand
  • fascinating professors for Economics

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Fairly easy class
  • easy A
  • incredibly difficult to fail unless you just don't attend

Theme 3

📝 About Workload & Assessment

  • Four quizzes and a final

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Fourteen in-person reviews from 2014-2018 with detailed grade and assessment notes and a .

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ECON47 reviews
ECON24 reviews
148151 review
MICROECON1 review
MICROECONOMICS1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 1 · A 6 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1