AI Rate Professor

Art History

David Goetz

ARTH22 · ARTH.22 · ARTH29 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
16/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.7

The decision

Avoid unless this exact art history course is required for your major and you can never miss class.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderSkip class and failWeekly quizzesUnapproachableDisorganized lectures
  • .
  • and .
  • Students report and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

22/100

, and B- reports show an A is unlikely without intense perfect attendance and luck.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

18/100

, and high difficulty ratings make the content and assessment feel hard.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

8/100

Students say missing even one class tanks the grade and skip-class tags are constant.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

All three reviews and .

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

16/100

; one student only notes a tiny round-up from 79.99 to 80 and no .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

, and lecture-heavy expectations pile on.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

22/100

, and the classroom climate unapproachable.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Weekly quizzes and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person art history is high-pressure with , and mixed but often negative interpersonal tone.

Main concern

Public critique of , and .

What students said

“ . There are weekly quizzes that you have no way or idea how to study for.”
ARTH29
“ and goes too fast on the powerpoint for .”
ARTH22
“Honestly unless you need this class for your major .”
ARTH.22

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Frequent hard-to-study quizzes and and unfriendly.

Weekly quizzesTough graderAttendance tied to gradeLecture heavy

Assessment risk

Strict

22/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person, weekly quizzes are unpredictable, lectures move too fast for notes, and missing class heavily hurts the grade.

Weekly quizzesSkip class you won't passTough grader
“There are how to study for.”
ARTH29
“We have a and bring down your grade as well as attendance.”
ARTH22

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . There are weekly quizzes that you have no way or idea how to study for. He reads the mistakes you made on your paper IN FRONT OF EVERYONE! HE MADE ME CRY!”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person , and harsh tone. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Recommendation

12/100

“Honestly unless you need this class for your major .”

📝

22/100

“There are how to study for.”

😠 Classroom Climate

18/100

“He reads the mistakes ! HE MADE ME CRY!”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • how to study for
  • if you miss even

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • disorganized and goes too fast on the powerpoint
  • horrible at explaining what he wants of you
  • LECTURE HEAVY

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Climate

  • HE MADE ME CRY
  • Personally didn't find him very friendly

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Three detailed in-person reviews from 2017-2018 are , and tough quizzes.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ARTH.221 review
ARTH221 review
ARTH291 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B- 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values