AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Doris Schantz

MATH124 · MATH353 · MATH160 · MATH216 · MATH251 · STATS · MATH10 · MATH7 · 21 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.4/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

unless you have no other option and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProAvoid at all costsSelf-teach requiredReads from the bookTough graderOff-topic rants
  • Students report lectures are mostly textbook rewriting and off-topic rants with little real teaching.
  • , and partial credit is rare.
  • Nearly everyone says you must teach yourself via tutors or videos to pass.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Tough grading, no partial credit, and rare without heavy self-study.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Students say she overcomplicates simple math, rushes lessons, and leaves gaps that force self-teaching.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and skipping hurts your grade, yet lectures still feel useless.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Zero would-take-again signal and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

, and tests that punish any deviation from her method.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Lots of , and weekly work that often does not match what was taught.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Students say she reads the book, goes off on tangents, belittles questions, and leaves them to teach themselves.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Test-heavy setup with quizzes and learning.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

as confusing, lecture-heavy rants with mandatory attendance that still leave students teaching themselves.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“DOES NOT GIVE PARTIAL CREDIT!!! !!”
MATH124
“I am teaching myself the entire class and am considering taking a second W”
MATH353
“Literally reads right out of the book for tens of minutes and drones on about concepts that ”
MATH10

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and , and give little credit for partial work.

Test heavyNo partial creditHarder than homework

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as long, exacting, and tougher than weekly homework with no partial credit.

Test heavyNo partial creditScantron homework
“Need to make sure you answer to his test/quiz question to exactly how he does it or you'll get no credit.”
MATH124
“ teaches.”
MATH353

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !!”

Voice snapshots generated from 21 in-person reviews, , and . Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Recommendation

5/100

“ a waste of time.”

📚 Teaching Quality

12/100

“I learned more from the online tutorials than the lectures.”

⚖️

18/100

“DOES NOT GIVE PARTIAL CREDIT!!! !!”

🧠

20/100

“ unless you want to teach yourself.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • just rewrites everything from the book onto the board
  • goes on long off topic tangents
  • consistently shows up 15 min late

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • teaches
  • and

Theme 3

💔 About Student Experience

  • Don't ask questions, she will make you feel stupid
  • Get ready to be your own teacher

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

21

Recent reviews read by the AI

21

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

21 detailed in-person reviews spanning 2014-2018 with highly consistent negative themes on teaching and grading.

Inside 21 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 54
1 out of 515

Course coverage

MATH35312 reviews
MATH2512 reviews
MATH72 reviews
MATH101 review
MATH1241 review
Show 3 more courses
MATH1601 review
MATH2161 review
STATS1 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

3

B 3

C range

4

C+ 1 · C 2 · C- 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 2