AI Rate Professor

English

Tammy Chapman

ENG1B · 1B · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
16/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

Avoid Tammy Chapman unless you are already a strong writer and little support.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderSo Many PapersUnhelpfulRun Away
  • Harsh, picky grading with severe grade penalties for small length shortfalls.
  • Heavy paper load and high reading expectations in ENG1B.
  • Students describe her as , and unsupportive.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

15/100

Both reported grades were C and comments stress tough, unfair grading with steep penalties for minor paper-length issues.

Online and and unfair.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

, and strict length rules make the content and workload feel hard.

and high expectations.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

; online does not clearly relax participation rules.

Only the .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Would-take-again is 0% and comments say run while you can.

Both formats advise against taking her.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Students report tough, unfair grading and .

Format shift

and in-person comments.

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

Tags and comments stress SO , and end-of-term group discussion work.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Students call her negative, unhelpful, and unresponsive, with a nasty syllabus tone.

Format shift

In-person is more personal-hostility focused; online stresses unfair online expectations.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Grades hinge on papers and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person ENG1B is described as horrible with nasty tone, no help, and extreme page-length penalties.

Main concern

Negative affect, refuses emailed questions, and docks two letter grades for one short sentence.

What students said

“HORRIBLE!! Chapman is negative, unhelpful, and has ridiculous expectations.”
ENG1B

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online ENG1B feels overloaded with unfair grading and .

Main concern

useless for learning.

What students said

“Tough and ! For an online course, it is ridiculous how much expectations there is.”
1B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews barely describe traditional exams and focus on papers and graded discussions instead.

Paper-heavy gradingParticipation discussions

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

exam proctoring or format.

Strict paper length rules
“If page length, you lose two grades.”
ENG1B

Online

Online evidence centers on graded group discussion of .

Group discussion for grade
“Towards the end of the course you are expected to participate in ”
1B

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“RUN WHILE YOU STILL CAN!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews spanning online and in-person ENG1B, highlighting harsh grading and hostility. Credibility rating: Low.

🚫

8/100

“RUN WHILE YOU STILL CAN!!”

📉

12/100

“Tough and !”

📚 Paper Overload

18/100

“SO MANY PAPERS”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Chapman is negative, unhelpful, and has ridiculous expectations.
  • She refuses to answer my emailed questions in this online class
  • She has a nasty affect even in her syllabus.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If page length, you lose two grades.
  • Tough and !
  • everybody BS each other and if you don't BS 2 of your classmates... you will not get full mark.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two older reviews (2016-2018) with consistent negativity but tiny sample and limited grade detail.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

1B1 review
ENG1B1 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values