AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Larry Moore

CIMP241 · CIM260AB · CIM289 · CIMP220 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
94/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Take him for practical cloud or mobile development if you want to learn .

Best fit · Effort For RewardHands-on app developmentRecorded lecturesNo traditional examsProject-based finalExtra credit and clear grading
  • Learn by coding with him in class; lectures are recorded for easy review.
  • in recent courses; the .
  • , and strong care for students, including online.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

Recent students report A and A+ with and ; older project-heavy courses still demand serious build time.

Online review emphasizes clarity and ; in-person reviews stress .

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Content is practical and well taught, but newer coders still face real app-building work rather than trivia.

Both formats describe learn-by-doing; older in-person ASP.NET sections felt harder.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

85/100

because lectures are recorded; the one online review listed attendance as mandatory.

; the single online review says attendance was mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

98/100

All six reviews are 5/5 with .

Strong praise appears in both the online and in-person samples.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

84/100

, and project-based finals lead most recent students to high grades when they complete the work.

Format shift

Online and recent .

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Recent courses feel manageable with in-class homework help, but older ASP.NET finals can run 40-80 project hours.

Format shift

recent online and Android sections.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Every review calls him outstanding for , and real-world cloud or mobile skills.

Format shift

Both online and .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

15/100

and multi-week app projects; multiple reviews explicitly say exam.

Format shift

; the online review focuses on clear grading without describing a .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person app and cloud courses are highly praised for live coding, , and substantial but .

Main concern

Older ASP.NET .

What students said

“All his lectures are recorded LIVE, so if you miss something you can just watch it online. He does the as he goes; no reading from a textbook, exam.”
CIMP220
“ on over 3 weeks.”
CIMP220
“Expect 3+ hrs of and a 40 hour final project. Not an easy A but a great class with the latest in ASP.NET”
CIM260AB

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

One recent online CIM course , and a comfortable pace.

Main concern

Only one online review, so format-specific risks are still lightly evidenced.

What students said

“His lectures are very easy to follow, understand, and match with the notes he provides. The class moves comfortably paced, with lots of opportunities for .”
CIM289

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Recent courses replace traditional exams with and a multi-week application project.

No midterm or final examProject final appRecorded lecturesExtra creditClear grading criteria

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

92/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person courses often have exam; the final is building an application, with lectures recorded for review.

No midterm or final examApplication project finalRecorded lecturesHomework done in class
“ exam. The .”
CIMP220
“ on over 3 weeks.”
CIMP220

Online

The single online review does not describe webcam proctoring or Lockdown Browser; , and easy-to-follow lectures.

Clear grading criteriaExtra creditEasy-to-follow lectures
“There was no ambiguity in his expectations nor in . He seems to truly care about his students.”
CIM289

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Simply the Best! Take his class if you want to learn by doing. Even if you are not an experienced programmer.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews (1 online, 5 in . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“Simply the Best! Take his class if you want to learn by doing.”

🧪 Project-Based Finals

92/100

“ exam. The .”

💻 Hands-On Learning

95/100

“He does the as he goes; ”

🌐 Online Clarity

90/100

“His lectures are very easy to follow, understand, and match with the notes he provides.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • All his lectures are recorded which helps a lot when completing the homework
  • Great hands on class in application development
  • He seems to truly care about his students.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • lots of opportunities for
  • Not an easy A but a great class with the latest in ASP.NET
  • !

Theme 3

🛠️ About Projects

  • over 3 weeks
  • final project is 60-80 hours of work!
  • Expect 3+ hrs of and a 40 hour final project.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Only 6 perfect-score reviews with strong detail and both formats represented, but the small sample and .

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CIM2892 reviews
CIMP2202 reviews
CIM260AB1 review
CIMP2411 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 3 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values